TMI Blog2020 (12) TMI 638X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... R Scheme. The petitioner represented before the designated authority in the matter of amount determined under the SVLDR Scheme and the designated authority has communicated the petitioner vide letter dated 08.09.2020 that the request for adjustment of ₹ 15,69,098/- in SVLDR Scheme was not considered since this amount was not entered in ST-3 Returns. That apart, the last date of payment under ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... IT TAX No. 690 of 2020 - - - Dated:- 15-12-2020 - Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani And Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava, JJ. For the Petitioner : Dilip Singh For the Respondent : A.S.G.I., Dhananjay Awasthi, Gaya Prasad Singh ORDER 1. Heard Sri Dilip Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Gaya Prasad Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Dhanan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sment order was passed ex parte on 28.03.2017 against which the petitioner preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) which was dismissed on 13.02.2018 being barred by limitation. It appears that, thus, the order in original dated 28.03.2017 confirming the demand of ₹ 44,39,787/- has attained finality. 4. According to the petitioner, he had deposited a sum of ₹ 17,72,021 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... etition is with respect to the amount determined by the designated authority under the aforesaid SVLDR Scheme. The petitioner represented before the designated authority in the matter of amount determined under the SVLDR Scheme and the designated authority has communicated the petitioner vide letter dated 08.09.2020 that the request for adjustment of ₹ 15,69,098/- in SVLDR Scheme was not con ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
