TMI Blog2021 (1) TMI 662X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... licant either to move his second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. or challenge the rejection order dated 09.12.2020, but in place of doing so, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved with a prayer that the interim bail granted by this Court vide order dated 14.10.2020 passed in bail application No.5974 of 2020 be extended for a period of ten weeks, which is not permissible, therefore, the Court is of the view that the present application (U/S 482 Cr.P.C.) of applicant for extension of his interim bail is not maintainable. The application is misconceived and is, thus, hereby dismissed. - U/S 482/378/407 No. 66 of 2021 - - - Dated:- 12-1-2021 - Hon'ble Rajeev Singh , J. For the Applicant : ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... plicant was diagnosed with uncontrollable 'High Blood Pressure', pain in bilateral inguinal region, blood in urine, complaint of left sided intermittent chest pain and breathlessness etc. He further submitted that as the applicant suffered with multi-system ailments, therefore, seeing his medical condition, Bail Application No.5974 of 2020 was filed before this Court with a prayer for granting interim bail to the applicant and vide order dated 14.10.2020, interim bail was granted to the applicant while considering his medical ground for a period of six weeks on his furnishing a personal bond of ₹ 1,00,000/- and two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Court (PMLA), Lucknow to get himself treated at AIIMS, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Supreme court. He further submitted that the Bail Application No.5974 of 2020 was moved by the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and interim bail was granted on 14.10.2020 for six weeks, thereafter the aforesaid application was rejected by this Court by a detailed order on 09.12.2020, and no application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is maintainable for extension of interim bail dated 14.10.2020, therefore, the present application is not maintainable and is liable to dismissed with heavy cost. Considering the arguments of learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.S.G., it is evident that the applicant is the Director in the Amrapali Group of Companies and so many more case have been registered for offences under Sections 406, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ditional NOCs to create mortgages subject to payment of dues which were not paid. They issued such NOCs in collusion with builders. It was incumbent upon the bankers also to obtain clear unconditional NOCs which were not obtained and to ensure that the dues were paid to Noida and Greater Noida Authorities. They permitted diversion of money immediately after sanctioning of the loan and also in day-to-day transactions of Amrapali Group of Companies. It is also evident from the record that a case was registered against the applicant under the provisions of PMLA Act and the complaint was filed before the learned Special Judge, PMLA Act, Lucknow and thereafter, the applicant moved his Bail Application No.5974 of 2020, in which the interim b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
