TMI Blog2018 (10) TMI 1877X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... terest derived is utilised by several members of the appellant's club - HELD THAT:- Appellant/assessee fairly submits that the above Substantial Question of Law has been decided against the assessee in the assessee's own case. Further in the case of Madras Gymkhana Club vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax [ 2009 (7) TMI 68 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] an identical question came for considera ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ant : Mr.G.Ashokapathy for M/s.Pass Associates For the Respondent : Mr.Karthick Ranganadhan JUDGMENT [Delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam, J.] This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 07.10.2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras D Bench (the 'Tribunal' for brevity), in ITA No.610/Mds/2007, for the assessment year 2000-01. 2.The App ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Law has been decided against the assessee in the assessee's own case in T.C.A.Nos.928, 1067 to 1069 of 2009 dated 13.10.2009 (M/s.Madras Cricket Club vs. The Commissioner, Income Tax Officer, Company Ward IV (1), Chennai-34). 5.Further in the case of Madras Gymkhana Club vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax [(2010) 328 ITR 0348], an identical question came for consideration and the same ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
