TMI Blog2021 (2) TMI 628X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... th November, 2020 seeks clarification of Section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) on issues arising out of interception/detention and seizure/confiscation proceedings under Sections 129 and 130 of the CGST Act by the Karnataka authorities. The communication dated 17 th November, 2020 is in the nature of seeking legal opinion from CBITC. There is no such obligation ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2020 of the petitioner in a time bound manner - The petition is disposed of directing the respondent to decide the application dated 3rd November, 2020 of the petitioner under Section 30 of the Act, within four weeks of today. - W.P.(C) 1867/2021 - - - Dated:- 11-2-2021 - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Ya ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me within a reasonable time. 4. We have enquired from the counsel for the petitioner, whether there is any mandate in law on the respondent no.2 CBITC to reply to each and every representation made/communication sent to it. We may in this context notice that the communication dated 17th November, 2020 seeks clarification of Section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e petitioner then contends that the respondent no.6 has cancelled the registration of the petitioner. 7. We have enquired from the counsel for the petitioner, whether not the remedy thereagainst is to challenge the same instead of making representation thereagainst. 8. Though the counsel for the petitioner has no reply but the counsel for the respondent no.6 fairly informs that under Section ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
