Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (5) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er recording of conviction by the courts below. The present matter is ordered to be compounded and impugned judgments of conviction and sentence by the courts below are quashed and set-aside - the petitioner-accused is acquitted of the charge framed against him under Section 138 of the Act - petition allowed. - Cr. Revision No. 236 of 2020 - - - Dated:- 27-4-2021 - Hon ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma For the Petitioner : Mr. Surender Verma and Mr. Gambhir Singh Chauhan, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate ORDER Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Instant criminal revision petition filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.PC, lays challenge to judgment dated 4.1.2020, passed by the learn .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iption given herein above. 4. Being aggrieved and dis-satisfied with the aforesaid judgment of conviction recorded by the court below, accused preferred an appeal in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sundernagar, District Mandi, which also came to be dismissed vide judgment dated 4.1.2020, as a consequence of which, judgment of conviction recorded by the learned trial Court came to be upheld. In the aforesaid background, present petitioneraccused has approached this Court by way of instant proceedings, seeking therein his acquittal after setting aside the judgments of conviction recorded by the courts below. 5. Vide order dated 14.10.2020, this Court suspended the sentence imposed by the court below subject to petitioner .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... h the petitioner and has already received sum of ₹ 8,00,000/-, respondent bank shall have no objection, in case, prayer made in the instant petition for compounding of the offences is accepted and petitioner is acquitted of the charges framed against him. 10. Having taken note of the compromise arrived inter-se parties coupled with the fact that respondent bank has received ₹ 8,00,000/- under one time settlement, this Court sees no impediment in accepting the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for compounding of offence while exercising power under Section 147 of the Act as well as in terms of guidelines issued by the Hon ble Apex Court in Damodar S. Prabhu V. Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 5 SCC 663, wherein it has been catego .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates