TMI Blog1997 (5) TMI 448X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt Nos. 1-3, R.F. Nariman, R.N. Keshwani, R.V. Rangam, K. Samdani, A.V. Rangam and A. Ranganadhan, Advs. For the Respondent No. 4 ORDER K. Ramaswamy And D.P. Wadhwa, JJ. 1. These contempt petitions have been filed for non-compliance of the judgment of this Court in State Bank of India and Ors. v. Kashinath Kher and Ors. (1996)IILLJ654SC . The substratum of the complaint of the peti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... promoted would either have retired or would not be available. In that backdrop, he had advised the contemners to go by the existing reports and to consider them in accordance with the Rules for the promotion; therefore, they have not disregarded the directions of this Court. 2. It is seen from the judgment that specific and unequivocal directions have been given as to how and by whom C.Rs. are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the directions, they came forward with the same justification in a different form. In substance, their contention is that it is not practicable to write the ACRs at this distance of time. They have also further stated that they have obtained the advice of the counsel and on the faith of that, they have come to that understanding. When put a question, Shri Shanti Bhushan has taken responsibility o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
