TMI Blog2015 (10) TMI 2803X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... allowed the appeal and set aside the order of suspension, on the basis of an earlier decision of the Tribunal itself in the case of M/S. D. THIMMESWARA RAO AND OTHERS VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT IMPORT) [ 2013 (11) TMI 1045 - CESTAT CHENNAI] . In the said decision, the Tribunal noted the distinction between the proceedings under Regulation 20 and the proceedings under Regulation 22. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt licence. 2. Heard Mr. K. Mohanamurali, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. S. Murugappan, learned counsel takes notice for the second respondent. 3. The second respondent was issued with a Customs House Agent licence bearing No. R260/CHA. The licence was valid upto 6-4-2015. 4. On the basis of an investigation by the Docks Intelligence Unit of the Customs, the Commissioner of Custom ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ort) [Final Order No. 40566-40569/2013, dated 12-11-2013]. In the said decision, the Tribunal noted the distinction between the proceedings under Regulation 20 and the proceedings under Regulation 22. The Tribunal also took note of another decision of the Tribunal in Manjunatha Shipping Services Limited v. Commissioner of Customs (Import) [Final Order No. 40461/2013, dated 10-10-2013]. 6. As a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
