9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (7) TMI 271X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l is filed by the assessee against order dated 30/09/2019 passed by CIT(A)-42, New Delhi for assessment year 2015-16. 2. The grounds of appeal are as under:- 1. "The Ld. CIT (A) has grossly erred both on facts and in law in confirming the order of Ld. AO in making an addition of Rs. 8,98,110/- to income returned by the appellant. 2. The Ld. CIT (A) erred in facts and in law in failing to appr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s. 3,60,130/-. The case of the assessee was taken up for scrutiny assessment vide notice u/s. 143(2) dated 26/7/2016 by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer passed an order u/s. 143(3) dated 11/1/2017 thereby making addition of Rs. 8,98,110/- on the undeclared receipts of Rs. 1,01,59,619/- under the head income from business or profession and applied net profit rate of 8.84%. 4. Being agg ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to look into the account books and bank statement which demonstrated that the assessee's claim is just & proper. The Assessing Officer simply proceeded to treat the difference in receipts as business turnover. The Ld. AR further submitted that the CIT(A) also has not taken cognizance of this factual difficulty. 6. The Ld. DR relied upon the assessment order and the order of the CIT(A). 7. We ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
