TMI Blog2019 (9) TMI 1576X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ah (AR). For the Respondent : Shri Akhtar H. Ansari (DR). PER PAWAN SINGH, J.M. 1. This Miscellaneous Application (MA) under Rule 25 of Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules read with section 254(2) is filed by the assessee for recalling the order dated 16.01.2019 passed in ITA No. 3607/Mum/2017 for Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08. In the application, the applicant/assessee has stated that the as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the address of assessee was changed. The assessee has filed return of income for A.Y. 2016-17, 2017-18 showing new address of the assessee. The Assessing Officer intimated about the order of Tribunal at the new address of the assessee. The ld. AR submits that the assessee has good case on merit and would suffer injury, if the order is not recalled. The revenue would not suffer in the event, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of record further reveals that ld. DR for the revenue furnished report of Inspector from office of ITO-13(1)(1), Mumbai wherein it was reported that Inspector visited the address at B-16, Roopkamal, S.V. Road, Kandivali (W), Mumbai-67, however, the door of premises was locked, the notice of hearing was affixed (pasted). Before us, the ld. AR of the assessee vehemently submitted that the assessee w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|