TMI Blog2021 (2) TMI 1195X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... does not have the power to review of its own order. In so far as this Petition is concerned, the Petitioner as reflected in the cause title contains both the name of the Sole Proprietor as well as the name of the Sole Proprietary concern and hence the Petition can be taken on record. The Corporate Debtor is directed to file its reply to this Petition within a period of three (3) weeks from t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 25.02.2020 the Petitioner has already complied with the requirements of the provisions of the IBC, 2016. In the circumstances, it is not required of the Petitioner to amend the cause title as directed by this Tribunal vide Orders dated 25.02.2020 and 17.09.2020. Ld. Advocate for the Corporate Debtor however, objects to the said submission and represents that specifically this Tribunal has grant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y of the Application under Section 9 of IBC shows that it was not an Application which was filed merely in the name of Proprietorship hut it was stated that the Proprietorship is through Proprietor and the name of the Proprietor was added. It is also stated that even if it was to be stated that there was any defect same was allowed to be cured by the Adjudicating Authority and thus objection does ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
