Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (9) TMI 738

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ") relevant to the Assessment Year 2011-2012. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The learned CIT(A)-13, Ahmedabad, erred in law and/or on facts in confirming the addition of Rs. 40,00,000/- made by the AO, as Income from other sources. 2. The learned CIT(A) -13, Ahmedabad, erred in law and/or on facts in confirming the addition of Rs. 40,00,000/- made by the AO, u/s.56(2)(vii) of the IT Act as amount received without consideration. 3. The learned AO as well as learned CIT(A), erred in not considering various facts, submissions, explanations and clarifications as given by the appellant and further erred in not appreciating the facts and law in their proper perspective. The appellant craves leave to add, a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nal in dealing with appeals is thus expressed in the widest possible terms. The purpose of the assessment proceedings before the taxing authorities is to assess correctly the tax liability of an assessee in accordance with law. If, for example, as a result of a judicial decision given while the appeal is pending before the Tribunal, it is found that a non-taxable item is taxed or a permissible deduction is denied, there is no reason why the assessee should be prevented from raising that question before the Tribunal for the first time, so long as the relevant facts are on record in respect of that item. There is no reason to restrict the power of the Tribunal under section 254 only to decide the grounds which arise from the order of the Comm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ourt in the case of NTPC Ltd (supra) . Hence we admit the additional ground of appeal raised by the assessee and proceed to adjudicate the same. 6. At the outset, the learned AR for the assessee contended that the proceedings under section 147 of the Act were initiated by the AO on account of escapement of income of the capital gain generated on the sale of the property. For this purpose, the learned AR drew our attention on page 2 of the paper book where the reasons recorded by the AO is placed. 7. However, the AO has made the addition under the provisions of section 56(2)(vii) of the Act on account of the money received by the assessee amounting to Rs. 40 lakh from the company namely M/s Multi Industrial Ceramic Pvt Ltd. As per the AO, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . The assessee has not filed his return of income for A.Y. 2011-12. Considering the facts of the case, I have reason to believe that assessee's income w.r.t. LTCG/LTCL has escaped assessment for A.Y. 2011-12 within the meaning of section 147 of the Act. Therefore, this is a fit case to initiate proceedings u/s.147 of the income tax Act, 1961. Issue notice u/s.148 of the Act. 9.1 On perusal of the above reasons, it is transpired that there was the property which was sold by the assessee but the assessee failed to disclose the income under the head capital gain on account of transfer of such property. Accordingly, the AO formed his reason to believe that income of the assessee has escaped assessment. 9.2 Moving further, we find that the A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n holding so, we draw support and guidance from the judgment of Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in case of CIT vs. Mohmed Juned Dadani reported in 355 ITR 172 wherein it was held as under: In the result, it is held that the Tribunal was right in law in coming to the conclusion that when on ground on which the reopening of assessment was based, no addition were made by Assessing Officer in the order of assessment, he could not make additions on some other grounds which did not form part of reasons recorded by him. [Para 33 9.4 In view of the above, we draw our conclusion that the proceedings initiated under section 147 of the Act is invalid as there was no escapement of income in the hands of the assessee on account of sale of the prope .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates