9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (9) TMI 1113X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cant is arrested in the present case on the sole basis statement of Ankur Mittal and there is no evidence on the case file to show that the applicant/ accused was involved in getting any fake firms registered as alleged or opened fake bank accounts. No witness has been cited to corroborate the statement of Ankur Mittal or any other witness in any matter whatsoever. It is further averred in the applicant that the present case is purely based upon the documents alleged to the bank statement etc. and CGST is already in possession of the same. The applicant / accused has never avoided to participate in the investigation and no fruitful purpose would be served by continued detention of the applicant/ accused. It is further submitted that the fir ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eed to do any kind of assessment in the particular circumstances in this case because various proprietorship firms were forged and get registered in CGST by documents of PAN, Aadhar and other documents with the purpose of operating a net of fake invoices without actual supply of goods with a malafide intention to earn commission. The case against the applicant is not merely based on his disclosure statement, but as a result of investigation done by the Investigating agency wherein the entire nexus was revealed. Concluding his submission, the learned counsel submits that the accused has committed a serious economic fraud to the tune of Rs. 90 crores approximately. Though the complaint has been filed after completion of investigation, same ca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gh Bhati Vs. NCT of Delhi & Anr." Criminal Appeal No. 324/2019- Para 8, passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, 10. "Malvinder Mohan Singh Vs. State of NCT of Delhi & anr." W.P (Crl.) 814/2020-Para 45, passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court, 11. "Ajay Sagar & anr. Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence" Bail Application No. 591/2009, passed by Hon'ble Delhi High Court, 12. "R.S.Joshi, Sales Tax Officer, Gujarat & ors. Vs. Ajit Mills Ltd. & anr." (1977) 4 SCC 98, passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, 13. "Sunny Singhal Vs. Central Goods and Service Tax Commissionerate, Rohtak" Bail Application No. 306/2019, passed by Learned District & Sessions Judge, Rohtak. Having considered the submissions made by learned co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
