Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (10) TMI 8

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... before us: "1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT erred in summarily dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant on the grounds that the same was filed manually and not electronically as required in terms of revised Rule 45 substituted vide notification No. SO 637 (E) dated 01.03.2016. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ld. CIT erred in not appreciating that the appeal was otherwise filed within the prescribed time limit and that there was only a procedural lapse on the part of the appellant in filing the appeal manually rather than electronically. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the ld. CIT(A) erred in disallowing a sum of Rs. 1,77,180/- paid by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... me Tax (appeals) w.e.f 01.03.2016 in respect of persons who were required to file returns of income electronically. It was further noticed by the CIT(A) that the CBDT taking cognizance of the fact that as in some cases the tax payers who were required to e-file 'Form 35' were unable to do so due to lack of knowledge about e-filing procedure and/or technical issues, thus, had vide its Circular No. 20/2016 [F.No.279/MISC/M-54/2016/ITJ], dated 26.05.2016 deferred the EVC functionality for verification of e-appeals and made the same operational from 12.05.2016 for individuals and from 19.05.2016 for other persons. Backed by the aforesaid facts, the CIT(A) was of the view that the assessee in question being a person who was required to have file .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t the same was so filed only after the order of the CIT(A) dismissing the appeal for the aforesaid technical default was received by the assessee. In the backdrop of the aforesaid facts, it was submitted by the ld. A.R that as the mistake in not filing the appeal as per the prescribed procedure was for bonafide reasons, therefore, in all fairness, the matter may be restored to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. 6. Per contra, the ld. Departmental Representative (for short 'D.R') relied on the orders of the lower authorities. 7. We have heard the ld. Authorized Representatives for both the parties, perused the orders of the lower authorities and the material available on record. On a perusal of the order of the CIT(A), we find .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esent case, the assessment in the above case was completed u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act 1961. However the assessee has filed appeal before Ld. CIT(A) in paper form as prescribed under the provisions of I.T. Act 1961 within the prescribed period of limitation. But the same was dismissed by Ld. CIT(A) by holding that assessee had not filed appeal through electronic form, which is mandatory as per I.T. Rules 1962. After having considered the entire factual position, we find that Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of 'State of Punjab Vs. Shyamalal Murari and others reported in AIR 1976 (SC) 1177' has categorically held that courts should not go strictly by the rulebook to deny justice to the deserving litigant as it would lead to miscarriage of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lso noticed that the Coordinate Bench of Hon'ble ITAT Delhi Bench in appeal ITA No. 6595/Del/16 in case titled Gurinder Singh Dhillon Vrs. ITO had restored the matter to the file of Ld. CIT(a) under identical circumstances with a direction do decide appeal afresh on merit, after condoning the delay, if any. Since in the present case, we find that appeal in the paper form was already with Ld. CIT(A), therefore in that eventuality the Ld. CIT(A) ought not to have dismissed the appeal solely on the ground that the assessee has not filed the appeal electronically before the appellate Commissioner. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as well as the case laws discussed and relied upon above, we are of the considered view that the caus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates