9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (5) TMI 977X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i, Zal Andhyarujina, Arvind Nigam, Advs. for Gagrat & Co. For the Respondents : N. Natarajan, Sr. Adv., P. Parmeswaran and A. Mariarputham, Advs. JUDGMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Leave granted. 3. In a criminal case known as Bofors case three Hinduja brothers are charge-sheeted for the offences punishable under Sections 120-D and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... submitted that there is no question of not returning to this country as the appellants are having large stake and as such they were Indian Nationals prior to few years. It is their submission that apart from various industrial activities they are also involved in other social activities including charitable activities. It is pointed out that the appellants all throughout were co-operating with th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... day to day examination of the witnesses and in completing the trial as directed by the High Court, i.e. within six months. 7. Considering the facts and circumstances, for the time being as an interim measure, the appellants, namely, Mr. Srichand P. Hinduja (in Crl. Appeal No...... of 2001 @ SLP (Crl) 1828/2001) and Mr. Gopichand P. Hinduja (in Crl. Appeal No..... of 2001 @ SLP (Crl) No. 1829 of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
