Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2021 (12) TMI 1211

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ning to Assessment Year (A.Y) 2009-10. 2. The solitary ground raised by the Assessee before us reads as under: 1. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Vadodara has erred in law and on facts of the case in confirming the addition of Rs. 3,83,445/- as income from Long Term Capital Gains made by the Assessing Officer though there was no such gain earned by the Appellant. 3 During the course of hearing before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee pointed out that the appeal relates to order passed in re-assessment proceedings u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act which was upheld in first appeal by the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that the addition relates to alleged bogus Long Term Capital Gain claimed by the a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssment and the income of Rs. 3,83,445/- has escaped assessment for the A.Y. 2009-10." (P.M. Karve) Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax Anand Circle, Anand Date: 22.03.2016 To the reply filed before the A.O. denying any such investment ,as stated in the reasons, to have been made by the assessee reproduced at Para no. 4 of the assessment order as under: 4. Copy of reasons recorded for initiation of proceedings u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act was supplied to the assessee on 17.06.2016 and notice u/s. 142(1) along with show cause was issued on 25/11/2016. In response to the show cause, the assessee has submitted her reply which is reproduced as under: "We emphatically bring to kind notice that none of the value is invested by us. It is e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on to reason of reopening the case is made on 23.06.2016 on following grounds. (a) The department received information that there is claim of LTCG of Rs. 3,83,445/- is bogus claim in the income. (b) It was stated that I do not have any company in my total income and that no claim whatever is made. (c) There is full and true disclosure of material facts during assessment proceeding. (d) Order U/s. 143(3) of the Act was made on 29/10/2011. As per assessment order there is no LTCG income as stated in reason of reopening the case. 4. Your appellant categorically stated and furnished explanation on 11 /11/2016 that there is gross loss took place of Rs. 8,95,770/- and hence nothing is claimed in return of income filed. The facts submitt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eleted and oblige. Thanking you," Our attention was drawn to the finding of the A.O. making the addition of the alleged bogus long term capital gain merely on the basis of information in his possession and without meeting and addressing the contention of the assessee that it had not made any such investments, at para no. 4.1 and 4.2 of the order as under: 4.1. Submission of the assessee has been considered and has not been found correct at all. As per the information available with this office and information gathered from the various agencies viz/ Motilal Oswal Securities Ltd., Mumbai and Bombay Stock Exchange, Mumbai which is placed on records, it is found that the assessee has made various transactions through his Demat account whic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ve considered the submissions of the learned Authorized Representative and the order of the Assessing Officer. In the appellant case the assessment proceedings u/s. 143(3) for the year has been completed on 29.12.2011 after an addition of Rs. 22,28,450/- u/s 69A of the I T Act. After completion of the assessment the A.O. has received information regarding bogus claim of LTCG from the office of the Pr. Director of Income Tax (lnvestigation) Surat for the year under consideration. The A.O. has reopened the assessment u/s 148 of the I T Act and after considering the submission of the assessee made an addition of Rs. 3,83,444/- u/s 69 as undisclosed income. During the appellate proceedings the LD. A.R of the appellant has pressed that the asses .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates