TMI Blog2022 (3) TMI 203X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .2011 - HELD THAT:- It is noticed that the petitioner has been sending representations from 2012, which has not been evoked any response from the respondent. Considering the fact that the issue appears to be answered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE VERSUS M/S. G.M. EXPORTS OTHERS [ 2015 (9) TMI 1162 - SUPREME COURT] , this writ petition is disposed off ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing duty. Thereafter, for a period of six months there was no levy at all. Thereafter, the final findings was given by the designated authority, pursuant to which, Notification No.82/2011-Customs dated 25.08.2011 was issued by the Central Government levying anti-dumping duty. 3. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the Bills of Entry were assessed provisionally in view of the provisio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as the case may be. 5. It is noticed that the petitioner has been sending representations from 2012, which has not been evoked any response from the respondent. Considering the fact that the issue appears to be answered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, I am inclined to dispose this writ petition without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, by directing the respondent to pass appropri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
