TMI Blog2022 (3) TMI 352X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntations over the years but has not received any response from the respondent - HELD THAT:- It is an admitted position that after the shop was demolished in 1975 and the formulation of policy in 1977 and even after petitioner was communicated by letter dated 02.06.2010 that his representation has been considered by the competent authority and his request could not be acceded to, petitioner has no ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mar, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.1/North DMC Mr. Ashim Vachher, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kunal Lakra for R-2 DDA Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate and Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate for R- 3/ DUSIB JUDGMENT Petitioner seeks a direction to respondent no. 1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 11.10.201 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t repeatedly, petitioner has been writing representations over the years but has not received any response from the respondent. 6. Perusal of the paper book shows that as far back as on 02.06.2010, petitioner was responded by the respondent no. 1 informing him that his representation has been considered by the competent authority and it was decided that there was no scope for any new entrance i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he seemingly innocuous prayer of the petitioner, of seeking a direction to respondents to dispose of his representation, appears to be an attempt, on part of the petitioner, to seek to create a fresh a cause of action so that he can overcome delay and latches. 11. In view of the above, there is no ground to direct respondents to even decide his representation. I find no merit in the petition. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
