TMI Blog2022 (3) TMI 352X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... No.1/North DMC Mr. Ashim Vachher, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kunal Lakra for R-2 DDA Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate and Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate for R- 3/ DUSIB JUDGMENT Petitioner seeks a direction to respondent no. 1 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 11.10.2019, by which petitioner is seeking a direction to respondent to allot an alternative shop in lieu of the sh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e respondent. 6. Perusal of the paper book shows that as far back as on 02.06.2010, petitioner was responded by the respondent no. 1 informing him that his representation has been considered by the competent authority and it was decided that there was no scope for any new entrance in the existing plan and as such his request could not be acceded to. 7. Petitioner thereafter has again been repres ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|