Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (4) TMI 422

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be said that the service received and used in head office does not relate to the manufacturing activity. Had this same office is maintained in the factory premises, there would not have any objection by the Revenue. The location of the head office is immaterial so long it is used only for the operation of the factory s activities, therefore, any service received in head office is in relation to the manufacturing activity of the appellant. This specific issue has been considered by this Tribunal in various judgements - reliance can be placed in the case of M/S. HID INDIA PVT. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX BANGALORE [ 2016 (11) TMI 99 - CESTAT BANGALORE] , where on similar issue, credit was allowed. Thus, even though the in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 3. Shri Dinseh Prithiani, Learned Assistant Commissioner (Authorised Representative) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He cited the following judgements. Sundaram Brake Linings 2010 (10) TRI 172 (Tri. Chen.) Maruti Suzuki Ltd. 2009 (240) ELT 641 (SC) Maruti Suzuki Ltd. 2017 (47) ELT 273 (Tri. Chand.) Mahindra and Mahindra 2015 (39) STR 316 (Tri. Mum) Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. 2016 (44) STR J57 (All.) 3.1 From the above judgements, he submits that only services which are integrally connected to the manufacturing activity is admissible as input service. In the present case, the service was received in the head office, therefore, it cannot be said that the said service is in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the appellant company in connection with company s business. Therefore, in view of the Tribunal judgment in the case of Good Luck Steel Tubes Ltd. (supra) vide final order No. 750/2012-SM, dated 1-6-2012, Cenvat credit would be admissible in respect of this service. 7. As regards the services of maintenance of the Head office the same has to be treated as in relation to manufacturing of business of the appellant. Therefore, this service would also be covered by the definition of input service . 8. In view of the above discussion, the impugned orders denying Cenvat credit are not sustainable. The same are set aside. The appeals are allowed. In case of HID India Pvt. Ltd. Tribunal has observed as under: 3 . The lea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l cited the decision of Bangalore Bench in the case of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. v. CCE : 2011 (22) S.T.R. 429 and another decision of the Tribunal in the case of Carrier Air-conditioning Refrigeration Ltd. v. CCE reported in 2016 (41) S.T.R. 824 wherein the Tribunal has categorically held that the renting of immovable property for setting marketing office fall in the definition of input service and the assessee is entitled to take Cenvat credit on these services. 4 . Following the ratio in the above decisions, I allow the appeals of the assessee by setting aside the impugned order with consequential relief. 6. As regards the submission made by learned Authorised Representative and reliance on various judgements, I find that the ju .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates