2022 (4) TMI 459

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... M.P.Shameem Ahamed, Akhil Philip Manithottiyil For the Respondents : Sri. Jose Joseph JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order for the assessment year 2017-18, petitioner preferred an appeal as Ext.P3 before the 2nd respondent on 20-01-2020. In the meantime, due to the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic and the financial difficulties, petitioner was called upon to submit its written submissions utilizing .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r respondents, on the other hand contended that petitioner had already approached this Court in W.P.(C)No.6141 of 2020, wherein the direction of the income tax officer to deposit 20% of the amount demanded was found to be reasonable. In spite of the aforesaid judgment, petitioner had failed to deposit the said amount and it is in such circumstances that the respondents were compelled to initiate p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ircumstances, I am of the view that, this is a fit case where the circumstances warrant a direction to dispose of the appeal itself in a time bound manner. As already more than 18 months have elapsed since the petitioner was directed by the respondents to upload the hearing note which it had in fact done, and even after that, the respondents failed issue the final order in the appeal, interests of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X