Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (5) TMI 761

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... persons under Clause 26 of the Settlement Regulations, 2018. SEBI should reconsider and seriously give a thought in coming out with a fresh scheme under Clause 26 of the Settlement Regulations, 2018. Such scheme can be a onetime scheme for this class of person. The terms of settlement should be attractive so that it could attract the noticees / entities to come forward and settle the matter which will ameliorate the harassment of penalty proceedings to the noticees and at the same time would help to clear the backlog of these pending matters before various AOs. While considering the scheme SEBI should take into consideration the provision of Section 15HA of SEBI Act prior to the amendment made by Act No. 27 of 2014 with effect from September 8, 2014. We find that various AOs have imposed a sum of Rs. 1 lakh for similar trades which were executed prior to September 8, 2014 and Rs. 5 lakh have been imposed for similar trades after the amendment of September 8, 2014. SEBI should also take into consideration that only a few trades were executed for small gains and some of the AOs have exonerated these noticees on the ground that such miniscule trades did not create any impact. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... quarely covered by the decision of this Tribunal in Global Earth Properties and Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs. SEBI, Appeal No. 212 of 2020 decided on September 14, 2020. 4. The learned counsel for the appellants tried to distinguish the said decision of this Tribunal on various grounds, namely, that the provisions of Section 15HA of SEBI Act is not applicable in view of the fact that appellant is not responsible for carrying out these transactions on an anonymous platform in as much as it was the broker who was responsible and who should have also been impleaded as a party and consequently the proceedings should be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties. Some of the appellants also contended that the investigation report was not supplied and in view of the latest decision of the Supreme Court in the matter of T. Takano vs Securities and Exchange Board of India Anr. (Civil Appeal Nos. 487 - 488 of 2022) decided on February 18, 2022 the impugned order should be set aside and the respondent should be directed to supply the investigation report before proceeding further. It was also urged that the penalty imposed is excessive and arbitrary and does not commensurate with .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e filed which were decided by this Tribunal in Global Earth Properties and Developers Pvt. Ltd. (supra). 7. We are informed that SEBI has initiated proceedings against 14720 entities which are pending before various AOs which have clogged up their dockets. 8. In the past when appeals against these kind of orders being passed we had directed SEBI by our order dated October 14, 2019 that SEBI should explore and come out with some mechanism or a scheme such as a Lok Adalat so that parties could settle the matter. Based on the directions given by this Tribunal, SEBI came out with a settlement scheme in August 2020 which was framed under the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, 2018 ( Settlement Regulations, 2018 for short). This scheme came to an end in December 2020. This scheme was not successful for two reasons, namely, that the terms of settlement perhaps were onerous, stringent and unviable and further the scheme was issued during the peak of the Covid pandemic. 9. We find that as on date more than 14,000 matters are pending before various AOs. Their dockets are exploding and the disposal of these matters will take atleast a couple of years. As a result, all th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... force . Where any proceedings have been initiated under the SEBI Act, any person may file an application for settlement of the proceedings. Section 15JB(3) provides that settlement proceedings would be conducted in accordance with the procedure specified in the Regulations. Chapter II provides the procedure for filing Application for Settlement , Chapter III provides the Scope of Settlement, Chapter IV provides the Terms of Settlement , Chapter V provides the constitution of a High Powered Advisory Committee which recommends the terms of settlement and Chapter VI provides the Procedure for Settlement . The procedure envisaged under the settlement rules is thus complicated and at times the terms of settlement becomes stringent. 14. The settlement scheme that was issued in August 2020 under Chapter VI of the aforesaid Settlement Regulations, 2018 did not generate interest to these small time noticees who had executed few trades for small gains as the proposed settlement terms were found to be stringent, onerous and unviable and that could be one of the reason why many noticees did not opt under that scheme. 15. We, however, find that the respondent could still initiate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... prior to the amendment made by Act No. 27 of 2014 with effect from September 8, 2014. We find that various AOs have imposed a sum of Rs. 1 lakh for similar trades which were executed prior to September 8, 2014 and Rs. 5 lakh have been imposed for similar trades after the amendment of September 8, 2014. 19. SEBI should also take into consideration that only a few trades were executed for small gains and some of the AOs have exonerated these noticees on the ground that such miniscule trades did not create any impact. 20. We also request SEBI that while framing a scheme under the Settlement Regulations, 2018 it may also take into consideration the reduction of the quantum of penalty imposed in matters decided so far. 21. We direct the Registrar of this Tribunal to send a certified copy of this order to the Chairperson of SEBI within a week for necessary information and action. 22. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary on behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order. Certified copy of this order is also available from the Registry on payment of usual charges. - - TaxTMI - TMITax - Se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates