Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (6) TMI 314

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be treated as part of CIRP cost and accordingly the I.A. No. 41 (KB)/ 2021 was disposed off. 2. Submissions of the Learned Counsel for the Appellant:- (i) The Appellant herein joined Rohit Ferro Tech Limited (under CIRP) as Head (Commercial) with effect from 21.11.2006, vide appointment letter dated 20.11.2006 and posted at the Jajpur Plant, Orissa of the said company. (ii) On 21.03.2016 the Appellant was promoted and appointed as Executive Director (Works) of the said Corporate Debtor for a period of three years i.e. upto 23.03.2019. (iii) The Appellant tenure of as Executive Director (Works) was renewed and he was reappointed as Executive Director (Works) with effect from 13.02.2019. at monthly salary of Rs. 2,14,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Fourteen Thousand Only) and he was also entitled to payment of bonus, leave encashment and gratuity. (iv) The terms of the agreement dated 13.02.2019 for the re- appointment of an Executive Director (Works) is marked as Annexure-B at Page- 40 to 43 of the 'Memo of Appeal'. (v) Keeping in view, the compliance with the Factories Act, 1948 with regard to appointment and/ or naming of a director as occupier of the factory/plant, he was also .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of compensation for loss of office, or as consideration for retirement from office or in connection with such loss or retirement. (2) No payment shall be made under sub-section (1) in the following cases, namely: a) where the director resigns from his office as a result of the reconstruction of the company, or of its amalgamation with any other body corporate or bodies corporate, and is appointed as the managing or whole-time director, manager or other officer of the reconstructed company or of the body corporate resulting from the amalgamation; b) where the director resigns from his office otherwise than on the reconstruction of the company or its amalgamation as aforesaid; c) where the office of the director is vacated under sub. section (1) of section 167; d) where the company is being wound up, whether by an order of the Tribunal or voluntarily, provided the winding up was due to the negligence or default of the director; e) where the director has been guilty of fraud or breach of trust in relation to, or of gross negligence in or gross mismanagement of, the conduct of the affairs of the company or any subsidiary company or holding company thereof; and f) where th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... plant premises, sale of scrap at under value, e.t.c. (c) Based on this, decisions was taken to terminate the service of Applicant (Appellant herein) in accordance with the terms of the Agreement at 13.02.2019 which was approved by CoC. (d) On 27.03.2020 one month notice had been given to the Appellant in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement dated 13.02.2019. (e) He further stated that the Appellant has been holding office of Director of Corporate Debtor and falls with the purview of 'related party' and therefore, all payments made to the Appellant including salary has to be made with the approval of CoC Members. (f) He also stated that the payment of salary the month of April, 2020 Rs. 2,14,000/- had been paid to the Appellant after obtaining approval of the CoC. (g) Respondent No. 2 has also stated in his 'Reply Affidavit' that Appellant had moved to the Adjudicating Authority for termination of the appointment of the Resolution Professional which was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority. (h) He further stated that Rs. 8,02,500/- was remitted to the Appellant herein by the Corporate Debtor as payment of gratuity. * With regard to Appellant le .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -(1)No director of a company shall receive any payment by way of compensation in connection with any event mentioned in sub-section (1) of section 191 unless the following particulars are disclosed to the members of the company and they pass a resolution at a general meeting approving the payment of such amount - (a) name of the director; (b) amount proposed to be paid; (c) event due to which compensation become payable; d) date of Board meeting recommending such payment; (e) basis for the amount determined; (f) reason or justification for the payment; (g) manner of payment - whether payable in cash or otherwise and how; (h) sources of payment; and (i) any other relevant particulars as the Board may think fit. (2) Any payment made by a company by way of compensation for the loss of office or as a consideration for retirement from office or in connection with such loss or retirement, to a managing director or whole time director or manager of the company shall not exceed the limit as set out under section 202. (3) No payment shall be made to the managing director or whole time director or manager of the company by way of compensation for the loss of office or as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Debtor and as per the provisions of the IBC, Appellant falls within the purview of the definition of 'related party'. After determining the amount due to the Appellant on account of leave encashment, the aforesaid issue was placed before the members of the CoC in its meeting held on 07.12.2020 for their approval. However, the same was not approved by the members of the CoC. (v) Respondent No. 1 admit that gratuity amount of Rs. 8,02,500/- due to the Appellant has been paid by the Corporate Debtor. (w) Due to various reasons brought out above and stated that Adjudicating Authority disposed off I.A of the Appellant without considering the prayers in I.A. No. 41 (KB)/ 2021. FINDINGS : We have pursued the record available and also heard Learned Counsel for the Parties based on which we observe the following:- (i) Admittedly, the gratuity amount of Rs. 8,02,500/- has been paid, during the pendency of the I.A before the Adjudicating Authority. (ii) Leave Encashment of Rs. Rs. 5,67,100/- has been admitted to be payable and since being Director he has been treated as related party and therefore, the Adjudicating Authority has rightly recorded that leave encashment amount payable .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates