2017 (2) TMI 1519

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... les Tax
Mr. Rajiv Shakdher, J. For the Petitioner : Mr. Nallathambi for M/s. Karunakar. For the Respondent : Mr. K. Venkatesh Government Advocate. ORDER 1. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner says that he does not wish to press the writ petition against respondent nos.2 and 3. Accordingly, respondent nos.2 and 3 are dropped from the array of parties. 2. Accordingly, issue .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Rs. 0040 31.12.2016 12,24,615/- 0043 30.01.2017 5,62,570/- 5. Admittedly, while the invoices qua subject goods were generated on 31.12.2016 and 30.01.2017, they were moved only on 07.02.2017. 5.1. It is, in these circumstances, that the subject goods were detained by the respondent. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that there were several reasons for delay which, inter alia, inc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case, coupled with the fact, that the petitioner offers to pay one time tax, I am inclined to direct the release of subject goods. Consequently, upon payment of one time tax, by the petitioner, equivalent to the sum of Rs.2,98,013/-, the respondent will, forthwith, release the subject goods to the petitioner. 10. Needless to say, the payment of tax by the petitioner will be without prejudice to i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X