TMI Blog2019 (6) TMI 1677X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Pleader, the answer would have to be given as in the negative, that the petition could not be admitted. It may be pointed out here that the petitioners also knew that the directions given in the order dated 4th June, 2019 were likely to have a prohibitive impact on this petition. This can be seen from the averments made in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Misc. Application filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. One of the averments is that 16% seats, reserved in favour of the socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC), are subject matter in this petition and therefore the decision in this petition is likely to substantially affect the admisision process. The other submission was that with such impact on the admission process an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in CAW No. 1451 of 2019 and CAW No. 1452 of 2019. Mr. Anil Sakhare, Senior Advocate for the applicant in CAW No. 1492 of 2019. Mr. A.S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for the applicant in CAW No. 1493 of 2019. ORDER Heard. We find that the intervenors/students are necessary parties and therefore the applications are allowed. The intervenors/applicants be joined as respondents. Necessary amendments be carried out to the cause title forthwith. Applications stand disposed off. WRIT PETITION NO. 3771 OF 2019 We have heard Shri S.P. Dharmadhikari, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner, Shri Vijaysingh Thorat, learned Senior Advocate for the respondent nos.1 and 2. Shri N.S. Khubalkar, learn ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Subsequently, while hearing another SLP challenging the E.W.S quota, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, on 4th June, 2019, gave certain directions. The Hon'ble Supreme Court directed that no further petition/appplication in respect of the admission for the present academic year would be entertained by any court, as there was already delay in admission of the medical students through out the State of Maharashtra. This order was rendered by the Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court presided over by Hon'ble Two Judges. It was after passing of such directions on 4th June, 2019, that the petitioners felt that there was a need for seeking clarification/modification of the order dated 4th June, 2019 and therefore the petitioners filed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... larification Once such an interpretation is made, we do not think that it would be of any use for us to make another attempt at further constructing the order dated 4th June, 2019. This is even emphatically so because Hon'ble Apex Court has passed the order dated 10th June, 2019 after considering all the submissions made in the application seeking clarification/modification and held that the order dated 4th June, 2019 was absolutely clear. It may be pointed out here that the petitioners also knew that the directions given in the order dated 4th June, 2019 were likely to have a prohibitive impact on this petition. This can be seen from the averments made in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the Misc. Application filed before the Hon' ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
