Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2020 (5) TMI 720

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the Assessment Year 2014-15 in an assessment order passed u/s 143 of the Act. The principle of consistency has to be applied. Nothing needs to be added to the detailed finding of the ld. CIT(A). The case law discussed is appropriate. Thus, we uphold the finding of the ld. CIT(A) and dismiss this appeal of the revenue. - ITA No. 2328/Kol/2018, C.O. No. 134/Kol/2018 A/o ITA No. 2328/Kol/2018 - - - Dated:- 29-5-2020 - Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member Sri Aby T. Varkey, Judicial Member Shri Dhrubajyoti Ray, JCIT, D/R, appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Shri S. Jhajharia, FCA, appeared on behalf of the assessee. ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :- This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... invoked in the assessee s case. 4) If the answer to Question No. 3 is affirmative, then whether the revenue so recognized and the expenses so considered by AO by treating the entire project as one is right and therefore merits of the question of computation so made by the AO. 4.1. The questions were answered by the ld. CIT(A) in the following manner :- Having considered the aforesaid, I intend to first discuss and decide on Questions No. 1 2. Se. 145(1) of the IT Act states that the income chargeable under the head profit and gain of business or profession shall be computed in accordance with either cash or mercantile system of accounting regularly employed by the assessee . It is only effect from 1.4.2015 that a change has be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... also have gone through the various aspects of Accounting Standard 7 and the FAR issue by the ICAI and the various judicial precedents as well. On a perusal of the Accounting Standard 7, it is very clearly mentioned that the Accounting Standard 7 does not apply Builders, Developers and hence from inception AO is on a wrong footings sir the Developer is developing the units on its own behalf and not on behalf of ultimate buyer and the ultimate buyer gets the property only when the possession of the same is handed over on completion of the project and receipt of the occupation certificate from the local authorities. Even the reliance as Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment treating the appellant as a mere contractor is misplaced since the iss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Completion Method in earlier year and therefore there was no justification for adopting the Percentage Completion Method in subsequent year on selective basis. CIT (Central), Gurgaon v. Principal Officer, Hill View Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd (2017) 81 taxmann.com 58 (P H)- Where assessee company had been consistently following Project Completion Method to compute profits in real estate business, Assessing Officer could not apply Percentage Completion Method [In favour of assessee] Nandi Housing Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2004) 2 SOT 395 (Bang.)- Project Completion Method- Whether since, in instance case, it was not department's case that assessee had not followed said method in its true requirements nor department had found any mist .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... gh sale consideration might have been received earlier from buyer- Tribunal accepted assessee's contention that since firm was following Project Completion Method for offering income to tax, same would be subjected to tax upon completion of sale, though amount may have been received earlier from buyer [In favour of assessee] ITO v. Matushree Builders Developers- ITA No. 2652/Mum/2016 dt. 29.11.2017 Haware Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT- ITA No. 2642/Mum/2012 dt. 4.10.2013 DCIT v. Friends Buildtech Developers Pvt. Ltd.- - ITA No. 2102/Del/2012 dt. 11.3.2016 Prestige Estate Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (2010) 129 TTJ 680 (Bang.) 5. We see no infirmity in these findings of the ld. CIT(A). Project Completion Method is a w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates