TMI Blog2022 (8) TMI 632X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion is heard and disposed of. Interim order, already granted, shall remain in force for a period of eights weeks or till the writ petition is heard, whichever is earlier. The facts of the case on hand are identical to that of the aforementioned decision except of the slight change of dates - In the instant case, the writ petition was filed during March, 2021 and on 29th April, 2022 the learned writ Court permitted the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent be kept on record and directed that the respondent shall not take any coercive action against the appellant for recovery of the demand in question. This interim order had continued till the writ petition was disposed of by the impugned order. The order dated 29th June, 202 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d order dated 26th July, 2022. The said judgment and order reads as follows:- This intra-Court appeal is directed against the order dated 29th June, 2021 passed in WPA 7764 of 2021. The appellant had filed this writ petition praying for directions upon the respondent authorities to accept payment of tax dues to the tune of Rs.56,55,490.80 as per the Statement in Form SVLDR-3 issue discharge certificate settling the disputes accordingly and granting all consequential reliefs from 01.04.2014 to 01.06.2017. The appellant also prayed for appropriate direction to allow the appellant to avail the benefit of SVLDR Scheme, 2019. The writ petition was heard on 25.11.2021 and the learned Single Judge passed the following order:- Heard lea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mber, 2021 at the top of the list. Leave is granted to the petitioner to file supplementary affidavit annexing the legible copy of the document regarding attachment of bank account in question by 29th November, 2021. On reading of the above order it is seen that the Court was satisfied that the appellant had made out a prima facie case and precisely for such reason affidavit-in-opposition was directed to be filed by the respondent and the writ petition was directed to be listed on 10th December, 2021 at the top of the list. Further, the learned writ Court had granted permission to file supplementary affidavit, which has also been complied with. Subsequently the matter was heard on 14.12.2021 and on the said date the learned writ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Judge on merits and in accordance with law. Since the appellant had benefit of order of status quo in pending writ petition the respondent authorities are directed not to take any coercive action against the appellant till the writ petition is heard and disposed of. Interim order, already granted, shall remain in force for a period of eights weeks or till the writ petition is heard, whichever is earlier. Consequently, connected application stands disposed of. 2. The facts of the case on hand are identical to that of the aforementioned decision except of the slight change of dates. In the instant case, the writ petition was filed during March, 2021 and on 29th April, 2022 the learned writ Court permitted the affidavit-in-oppo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
