9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (3) TMI 1416X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... For the Applicant: Adv Mrinal Harsh Vardhan. For the IRP : Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advocate. ORDER 1A/3253/ND/2021 In the present matter IA/3253/ND/2021 has been moved on behalf of the IRP who has been appointed vide order dated 20.03.2020, whereby the prayer has been moved for excluding the period from 20.03.2020 till the date of presentation of the present application and also to direct the Corpora ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gistry and it was merely communicated on 14.07.2021. Though, the operational creditor has also failed to deposit the amount and did not approach the IRP, but it is apparently the duty of the Registry to intimate the order regarding initiation of the CIRP proceedings to the Ld. IRP. Therefore, apparently the default has occurred due to the reason that the Registry could not communicate properly to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ntinue as IRP. In this regard the Ld. Counsel for the IRP also relied upon citation Ashish Chaturvedi Vs. Inox Leisure Ltd. and others passed by Hon'ble NCLAT in CA No. 05 of 2020, whereby the period of 370 days was excluded due to the reason that there was non communication of order on the part of the Registry regarding initiation of the CIRP. The present matter is also of the same nature, as the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
