9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (10) TMI 771X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Advocate with Mr. Vikas Jain, Mr. Aviral Saxena and Mr. Manjeet Rathod, Advocates. Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Adeeba Mujahid, Jr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Advocate. J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J: CM APPLs.41912-41913/2022 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 13734/202 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s the transaction entered into by the Petitioner and does not contain any allegation of escapement of income. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner filed a reply to the show cause notice explaining the aforesaid transactions stating that the transaction had been recorded in the books of accounts of the assessee and had also been duly declared in the Return of Income. He ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nds that the Petitioner was not provided any proper and effective opportunity to reply to the authorities as there was no specific charge/allegation/basis in the show cause notice to suggest that income had escaped assessment and the grounds on the basis of which the impugned order has been passed were never put to it before the passing of the order making it impossible for it to counter the same. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re used by Manu Garments to purchase the shares of Bert Marketing Pvt. Ltd. 8. This Court is further of the opinion that if the foundational allegation is missing in the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act, the same cannot be incorporated by issuing a supplementary notice. 9. In the case of Mahashian Di Hatti Pvt. Limited (supra), there was a specific allegation that the assessee-comp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
