2022 (10) TMI 782

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rerak Khurana and Mr Mrityunjay Mahendra, Advs. Respondents Through: Mr Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr Anish Raj and Mr Dhruv, Advs. for R-2. [Physical Court hearing/ Hybrid hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): 1. This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner, which is a registered society, challenging Notification No.29/2018, dated 31.12.2018, issued by the Un .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... which are closely held entities. 3. Mr Satish Kumar, who appears on behalf of respondent no.2, on the other hand, says that the instant writ petition, filed at the behest of the petitioner-society, cannot be maintained. 3.1. Apart from this, it is also Mr Kumar's contention that the notification represents a policy decision, taken by the respondents, in the field of taxation. 3.2. It is also M .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X