TMI Blog2022 (11) TMI 573X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd above 0.50% referred above shall be transferred to TDF/WDF. The AO has taken the view that, since the assessee did not keep the funds pertaining to TDF/WDF in separate bank accounts and used it for its own business purposes, the amount so transferred to these funds would constitute income of the assessee. The assessee has acted as nodal or implementing agency for the schemes framed by GOI. Hence the amounts transferred to TDF/WDF are diverted at source itself and hence, the same does not belong to the assessee. Accordingly, the amounts so diverted to TDF/WDF cannot be brought to tax in the hands of the assessee. Disallowance of expenditure incurred on promotional activities - capital expenditure - 36(1)(xii) - Since the notification was not available for the year under consideration, the Ld CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance on the ground that the assessee is not a notified u/s 36(1)(xii) of the Act during the year. - HELD THAT:- When the notifying authority itself has mentioned that the assessee is being notified from AY 2013-14 onwards, we are of the view that the assessee cannot be deemed to have been notified in the year under consideration, being AY 2010-11. Acco ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... illage industries, rural infrastructure, handicrafts and other rural crafts and other allied economic activities in rural areas with a view to promote integrated rural development. The assessee filed its return of income for the year under consideration declaring a total income of Rs.1817.68 crores. The assessing officer completed the assessment determining total income of the assessee at Rs.2534.50 crores by making certain additions. The appeal filed by the assessee before Ld CIT(A) was partly allowed. Aggrieved by the order passed by Ld CIT(A), both the parties have filed these appeals on the issues decided against each of them. 3. We shall first take up the appeal filed by the revenue. The grounds of appeal urged by the assessee give rise to the following two issues:- (a) Relief granted in respect of interest receipts of Rs.628.55 crores transferred to Tribal development fund (TDF). (b) Relief granted in respect of interest receipt of Rs.4.88 crores transferred to Short term co-operative rural credit Fund (STCRC)/Watershed Development Fund (WDF). 4. The facts relating to both the issues are identical in nature and are being discussed in brief. The assessee claimed a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... margin of 0.50% was also called as Relative margin . It was submitted that the assessee has been directed to credit this surplus amount/relative margin to a separate fund called Tribal Development Fund (TDF). It was submitted that the above said amount of Rs.682.55 crores represents the surplus amount of relative margin. It is the contention of the assessee that it does not have right over the above said surplus amount or relative margin, as the RIDF amount itself is administered by it as per the directions given by GOI/RBI. Accordingly, the assessee has transferred the surplus amount/relative margin to TDF account by debiting interest expenses account. In support this submission, the assessee placed its reliance on various circulars issued by RBI from time to time, which has been tabulated by AO as under in the assessment order:- Sr. No. Particulars Purposes 1 RPCD. No. Plan. 898/04.09.01/2000-01 dated 30 April 2001 The rate of interest payable to the commercial hanks were linked with their shortfall in priority sector lending. For excess/surplus funds remaining ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ect of shortfall in priority sector lending and disbursing the same as loan to State Governments/ NRRDA. It was further submitted as under:- Here we would also like to clarify that the amounts lying in the Tribal Development Fund is not NABARD s own money and is the money of RBI spent/require to be spent as per the directions of RBI. To substantiate the same, we invite your attention to the following:- a. While computing the Net Worth/Net owned fund of NABARD, the funds lying in Tribal Development Fund are excluded. b. The RBI has at times issued directions to pay back the commercial banks the interest rate differentials on RIDF deposits (i.e., interest payable to commercial banks at flat rate of 6% and not linked with the shortfall in the priority sector lending). In view of the foregoing, it is submitted and it will be appreciated that- - We are merely acting as a Banker/agent of RBI/GOI for mobilization and disbursement of RIDF deposits; - We are entitled to a margin of only 0.5% as fixed/regulated by the RBI/GOI. - The interest rate differential/excess or surplus funds remaining with us is not NABARD s own money and is the money of RBI ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /- have been transferred to Tribal Development Fund without having brought to the ambit of tax (f) Tribal Development Fund is established operated by NABARD, substantial portion of Tribal Development Fund was available to NABARD in its common pool of funds and these funds were utilized for NABARD for its own business purposes. (g) As Tribal Development Fund continues to be treated as assessee's own funds; no income/interest/service-charges have been credited to Tribal Development Fund. (h) As per the Tribal Development Fund' document, the ownership of Tribal Development Fund' is vested only with NABARD and not with RBI or GOL (i) The assessee has failed to file any clarification from RBI despite of the repeated opportunities given to them. The assessee could not file any supporting documents which can substantiate assessee's contention that the funds transferred to Tribal Development Fund are actually the RBI's income/RBI's Funds and not the income of NABARD. Further, there has been no clarification from RBI or any supporting evidence from the RBI/assessee to prove that the Tribal Development Fund' is RBI's money which is being held by ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Ld CIT(A), however, accepted the submissions of the assessee and held that the impugned amount of Rs.682.55 crores does not fall under the definition of income as per section 2(24) of the Act. He held that the margin of 0.50% retained by the assessee alone shall constitute income of the assessee. Accordingly, he deleted the addition of Rs.682.55 crores made by the assessing officer. On similar reasons, he deleted the addition of Rs.4.88 crores also. The revenue is aggrieved by this decision. 8. The Ld D.R submitted that the assessee is placing reliance on the directions given by RBI with regard to transfer of surplus funds to TDF/WDF. However, the said RBI directions only suggest the manner of utilization of surplus/relative margin and hence it cannot be considered as diversion of income by overriding title. Hence these directions will not determine or bar the taxability of the surplus or relative margin under the Income tax Act. The Ld D.R submitted that the assessee has not kept the funds transferred to TDF account in separate bank account, i.e., it has put the funds in common hotchpots and was freely using them in its regular business activities. Accordingly, the Ld D.R sub ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... argin of 0.50% only and the remaining amount has been directed by GOI/RBI to be credited to TDF/WDF account. The Ld A.R further submitted that the assessee is only a nodal agency for implementing the above said scheme of Government of India. As per the directions given by GOI/RBI, it has transferred the surplus fund/relative margin to TDF account and held the said funds as trustee of GOI. Accordingly, the Ld A.R submitted that the surplus amount or relative margin cannot constitute income in the hands of the assessee. In support of these submissions, the Ld A.R invited our attention to the Budget Speech given by the Finance Minister on 15th March, 1995, wherein the Hon ble Finance Minister has announced establishment of Rural Infrastructure Development Fund within NABARD (the assessee herein). He also invited our attention to the guideline issued by RBI with regard to establishment of TDF/WDF. He further submitted that the Department of Financial Services under Ministry of Finance, vide its letter dated 20th February, 2013 has clarified that the assessee is only a trustee of these funds and interest under these funds do not count as income of the assessee. The Ld A.R accordingly ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s for completing ongoing projects relating to medium and minor irrigation, soil conservation, watershed management and other forms of rural infrastructure. The loans will be on a project specific basis with repayment interest guaranteed by concerned State Government. Priority will be assigned to projects which can be completed within the least time period. Resources for the Fund will come from commercial banks which will be required by Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to contribute an amount equivalent to a bank s shortfall in achieving the priority sector target for agricultural lending, subject to a maximum of 1.5 per cent of the bank s net credit. This is expected to create a corpus of about Rs.2,000 crore for completion of rural infrastructure projects. We notice that the Government of India has devised a scheme for increasing investment in Agricultural and rural infrastructure projects and accordingly, proposed to establish a new Rural Infrastructural Development Fund within NABARD, the assessee herein. It is also stated that the commercial banks shall contribute funds as per the directions given by RBI. 12. The Ld A.R submitted that the RBI has issued circulars in this re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Government of India has devised schemes for promotion of investments in agriculture and rural development. As per the scheme the banks were directed to deposit shortfall amounts in giving priority sector lending by banks with the assessee herein, which in turn, would lend the said money to State Governments to carry out various schemes of agriculture and rural development. The net surplus between the interest income and interest expenditure under this scheme was directed to be appropriated as under:- (a) The assessee herein should take 0.50% as its income. (b) The excess amount of surplus over and above 0.50% referred above shall be transferred to TDF/WDF. (c) The funds credited to TDF/WDF should also be used for specified purposes only. We noticed earlier that WDF was established with the assessee and the initial corpus has been contributed by the MOA, GOI and the assessee. The objective of the schemes is promotion of investment in agriculture and rural development. 15. The AO has taken the view that, since the assessee did not keep the funds pertaining to TDF/WDF in separate bank accounts and used it for its own business purposes, the amount so transferred to th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Hon ble Madras High court are extracted below:- 11. The Tribunal allowed the appeal. On a reference, a Division bench of this Court held that even before collection of the amount as directed by Central Government under the Molasses Control (Amendment) Order, the assessee was directed to keep this amount under a separate account under the head Molasses storage fund . Though the assessee collected this amount under the statutory obligation, it did not belong to the assessee, but to the molasses storage fund. The assessee could not utilize the amount in the said fund for any other purpose. The fund had to be utilized for the purpose of constructing a storage tank in accordance with the specifications given by the Central Government. If the assessee failed to collect such amount as directed by the Molasses Control (Amendment) Order, the Central Government would construct a molasses storage tank and recoup the construction charges from the assessee. Therefore, there was diversion of title at the source of the income collected under the directions given under the Molasses Control (Amendment) Order. The sum in question was not includible in the assessee s total income. 12. In the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... The RBI has given guidelines on receipt of deposit amount from banks, interest to be given thereon, manner of advancing loans to State Governments, the interest to be collected thereon, the manner of utilization of gains arising on such activities. (v) Most pertinent point to be noted is that the assessee is not allowed to take entire surplus as its income, i.e., the assessee was allowed to take only 0.50% as its income. The excess amount has been directed to be credited to TDF/WDF. (vi) Guidelines have been issued on the manner of utilization of the funds so credited. From the foregoing discussions, we are of the view that the assessee has acted as nodal or implementing agency for the schemes framed by GOI. Hence the amounts transferred to TDF/WDF are diverted at source itself and hence, the same does not belong to the assessee. Accordingly, the amounts so diverted to TDF/WDF cannot be brought to tax in the hands of the assessee. Accordingly, we affirm the order passed by Ld CIT(A) in respect of amount of Rs.628.55 crores transferred to TDF/WDF. For identical reasons, we uphold the order passed by Ld CIT(A) in respect of amount of Rs.4.88 crores transferred to WDF/STCRC f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not available for the year under consideration, the Ld CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance on the ground that the assessee is not a notified u/s 36(1)(xii) of the Act during the year. 25. The Ld A.R submitted that the assessee has been notified subsequently, vide Notification no.25/2014 dated 29th April, 2014. He submitted that the provisions of sec. 36(1)(xii) requires that the assessee should be notified and it does not state that such notification should be persisting in the year in which the deduction is claimed. Accordingly, he submitted that even if the assessee is notified for the purposes of sec.36(1)(xii) subsequently, the same would comply with the requirements of that section and hence the deduction claimed by the assessee should be allowed. He reiterated that merely for the reason that the notification has been issued subsequent to the closure of the assessment year, the assessee s claim should not be rejected. In support of this contention, the Ld A.R placed his reliance on the following decisions:- (a) Maruti Suzuki India Ltd vs. Union of India (2017)(84 taxmann.com 45(Delhi) (b) Banco Products (India) Ltd vs. DCIT (2018)(95 taxmann.com 132)(Guj). The Ld A. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e claim for non-approval of scientific research facility. Hence it was a question of interpretation of the provisions of sec.35(2AB) of the Act. That is the not the case here. When the notifying authority itself has mentioned that the assessee is being notified from AY 2013-14 onwards, we are of the view that the assessee cannot be deemed to have been notified in the year under consideration, being AY 2010-11. Accordingly, we confirm the disallowance made by the AO. 30. In view of the discussions made by us while adjudicating the issues urged by the revenue, one more fact has come to our notice, though the same has not been examined by the AO. From the list of expenses incurred from various funds, we notice that the assessee has spent a sum of Rs.44.70 crores out Watershed Development Fund. In the preceding paragraphs, we have held that the amounts transferred to Watershed Development Fund (WDF) is a case of diversion of income by overriding title. We have also held that the assessee is not the owner of funds so transferred WDF. If the above said amount of Rs.44.70 crores have been spent out of the funds so transferred to WDF as per the directions issued by GOI/RBI, the assessee ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
