TMI Blog2022 (8) TMI 1310X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... view, is apparently mischievous and I have no intention of encouraging the same. In light of the narration as above, this Writ Petition is dismissed with costs of Rs.50,000/- payable. - W.P.No.20575 of 2022 - - - Dated:- 11-8-2022 - THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH For the Petitioner : Mr.M.Balasubramanian ORDER The petitioner seeks a mandamus directing the respondent/Income Tax Officer to initiate action on certain third parties based on his representation dated 01.09.2021. Quite apart from the fact that the third party against whom allegations have been made is not even arrayed as a respondent, the Income Tax Department has introduced the Income Tax Informants Rewards Scheme, 2018 (in short 'Scheme' ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... vlok , Walajapet , Ranipet Via , Walajapet, Vellore District , now temporarily come down to Chennai , do hereby solemnly affirm and sincerely state as follows : 1. I am the petitioner herein 1 am well acquainted with the facts of the case. 2. I respectfully Submit that my wife Tmt.A.Sujatha purchased the subject property on 21.03.2001 ( vide Doc.No.598 of 2001 SRO . Adyar ) and also obtained patta in her name . A group of land grabbers namely 1.N.Ananthakrishnan , 2.Mrs.Poongodi and 3.A.Swamikannu created a bogus document for Rs.20 Lakhs . The said land grabbers , sold to another land grabber Mr.P.M.Ilavarasan who allegedly purchased for Rs.25 Lakhs . The guide line value of the property is Rs.69,50,000 / - . My wife filed C.S.No.803 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 14 by registered sale deed ( vide Document No.2380 of 2014 SRO , Adayar , Chennai ) for Rs . 1,50,00,000 / - ( Rupees One Crore Fifty Lakhs only ) to one T.V. Sivachidambaram . So far he has not paid Capital Gain Tax it will attract penalty and prosecution also . I have sent a representation by registered post dated 01-09-2021 along with copies of the sale deeds to the respondent for necessary legal action to be initiated against the said P.M. Elavarasan . It appears that no action is initiated against the said P.M.Elavarasan so far . Hence this Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to initiate action against the said P.M.Elavarasan in accordance with law based on the petitioners representation dated 01-09-202. 4. I respectful ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
