9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (1) TMI 905X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mpugned order' dated 26.06.2020 in CP (IB) No.128/BB/2020, passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority', (National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench) in 'disposing of' the Company Petition ('CP(IB) No.128/BB/2020') 2. The 'Adjudicating Authority', (National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench), while passing the 'impugned order' on 26.06.2020 in CP (IB) No.128/BB/2020 filed (under Section '9' of the 'Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 6 of the I&B Code (AAA) Rules, 2016) by the 'Appellant' / 'Petitioner' / 'Operational Creditor', at 'Paragraph Nos.8 to 10, among other things, observed, as under:- "8. It is not in dispute that Petitioner has rendered his faithful services to the Respondent in good faith without getting his ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... copy of this Order, and communicate its decision to the Petitioner" 3. Assailing the 'propriety', 'validity' and 'legality' of the impugned order dated 26.06.2020 in CP (IB) No.128/BB/2020, passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority', (National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench), the Learned Counsel for the 'Appellant' / 'Petitioner' / 'Operational Creditor', submits that the 'Appellant', raised an 'invoice dated 13.10.2019 for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh Only), in respect of rendering 'Professional Services', by attending the 'Kerala State Commercial Taxes Department', KVAT and CST, Assessment Proceedings for '5 years' i.e., 2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012, 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, and these 'Proceedings' had continued over a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , for its 'numerous services' on 'several dates', amounting to Rs.9,67,208/- and, in addition, to the above, in order to comply with the order dated 26.06.2020 passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority', (National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench), the same was complied with by the Respondent, keeping in mind, the 'services' rendered by the 'Senior Professional', a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) was paid. 7. The other 'Plea' raised by the 'Appellant' is that the 'Respondent' had paid Rs.10,67,208/-, for the 'services' rendered by the 'Appellant' and his 'Associates'. 8. The Learned Counsel for the 'Respondent' contends that the instant Comp. App. (AT)(CH)(Ins) No.120/2022 deserves to be 'dismissed', 'in Limine', and further, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt is 'not moonshine', this 'Tribunal', at this juncture, simpliciter deems it fit that directing the 'Appellant' to resort to approach the 'Competent Forum' for redressal of its grievances, in regard to the amount, claimed by the 'Appellant', for the services rendered, if he so 'desires' / 'advised'. 14. Viewed in that perspective, this 'Tribunal' is not inclined to interfere in the impugned order dated 26.06.2020 in CP (IB) No.128/BB/2020 passed by the 'Adjudicating Authority', (National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench). Conversely, we are in 'complete agreement', with the view, taken by the 'Adjudicating Authority', (National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench) in CP (IB) No.128/BB/2020 dated 26.06.2020, and it is 'devoid of me ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
