9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (5) TMI 232X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ing of Lord Vishnu's temple out of its total income for the said previous year of Rs.26,727/- and therefore since the petitioner - Trust had incurred expenditure exceeding 5% of its total income of that year on a particular religion, according to the learned Commissioner, the said Trust was not entitled to renewal of exemption under section 80G of the Act as per provisions of Section 80G(5)(B) of the Act and therefore, following the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Upper Ganges Sugar Mills reported in [1997] 227 ITR 578, the learned Commissioner rejected the said application for renewal. 2. The petitioner approached this Court by way of present writ petition being aggrieved of the said order. 3. Mr. Mahendra Gargeiya learned counsel for the petitioner urged that petitioner - trust is wholly a charitable trust and the object clause of the said trust-deed clearly shows that said trust had undertaken activities of charitable nature and it is not meant for any particular religion and therefore, the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in rejecting the application for renewal of exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. He submits that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in respect of such business; (b) the donations made to the institutions or fund are not used by it, directly or indirectly, for the purposes of such business; and (c) the institution or fund issues to a person making the donation a certificate to the effect that it maintains separate books of account in respect of such business and that the donations received by it will not used, directly or indirectly, for the purposes of such business; (ii) the instrument under which the institution or fund is constituted does not, or the rules governing the institution or fund do not, contain any provision for the transfer or application at any time of the whole or any part of the income or assets of the institution or fund for any purposes other than a charitable purposes. (iii) the institution or fund is not expressed to be for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste; (iv) the institution or fund maintains regular accounts of its receipts and expenditure; (v) the institution or fund is either constituted as a public charitable trust or is registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860), or under any law corresponding to that Act in force in any part ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng: Provided that no order of rejection of an application shall be passed without giving the institution or fund an opportunity of being heard. (6) The time limit within which the Commissioner shall pass an order either granting the approval or rejecting the application shall not exceed six months from the date on which such application was made: Provided that in computing the period of six months, any time taken by the applicant in not complying with the directions of the Commissioner under sub-rule (3) shall be excluded." 7. Now a scrutiny of relevant case laws on the controversy involved in the present case is considered expedient at this stage. From the side of the assessee-petitioner, following case laws are relied upon which are noticed with relevant extract from the same as below: 8. In Addl. CIT, Gujarat v. Surat Art Silk Cloth manufactures Association (1980) 121 ITR 1, the Hon'ble Apex Court held that where the main or primary objects are distributive, each and every objects must be charitable in order that the trust or institution may be upheld as a valid charity. But if primary and dominant purpose of the trust is charitable, another object which by itself may not b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion or fund for any purpose other than a charitable purpose. Sub-section 5 read with Explanation 3 makes it clear that the Commissioner can refuse to grant recognition under section 80G of the Act only in the event of finding that the claimed charitable purpose includes any purpose the whole or substantially the whole of which is of a religious nature." It was held that in the present case there was no such finding and hence the Commissioner ought not have refused the claim of petitioner. 11. In Sri Ramakrishna Sewa Ashrama v. CIT (2001) 252 ITR 171 (A.P.), the petitioner, a registered society, had many objects including those charitable in nature, to diffuse scientific knowledge on Vedanta and the promotion of science, literature and fine arts. One of the objects was preaching ideals of Hinduism. It was granted approval for deduction under section 80G but its subsequent applications for approval were rejected by the Commissioner on the ground that preaching of ideals of Hinduism and other religions amounted to an object of religious nature. The Hon'ble High Court, while setting aside the rejection and restoring the matter before Commissioner held that although the aims and objec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... charitable then nothing debars the authority from denying the approval. The purpose of the establishment-the real purpose as distinguished from the ostensible purpose-is germane to the inquiry, which the commissioner has to hold while granting or refusal to grant approval." 13. In Hiralal Bhagwati v. CIT (2000) 246 ITR 188, it was observed by the Gujarat Court that an object beneficial to a section of the public is an object of "general public utility." To serve as a charitable purpose, it is not necessary that the object must be to serve the whole of mankind or all persons living in a country or province. The Hon'ble Court further opined that the Commissioner of Income Tax has to examine the objects of creating the trust as well as an empirical study of the past activities of the appellant has to be done. The Commissioner of Income Tax has to examine that it is really a charitable trust or institution entitled for registration. 14. In CIT v. Sh. Jagannath Jew (1977) 107 ITR 9 (SC), the Hon'ble Supreme Court speaking through Krishna Iyer J. held at as under (page 19): "The law is set out thus by B.K. Mukherjea: "The fact that property is ordinarily described as debutter is cer ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssion for living creatures is a profound religious motivation. The sublime mind of Mullick was obviously in religious sympathy with fellow beings of the lower order when he showed this tenderness to birds and beasts and shared it with the public. The art gallery too had link with religion in its wider connotation although it is plainer to regard it as a gesture of aesthetics and charitable disposition. God is Truth. Truth is beauty, beauty is Truth. A thing of beauty is a joy for ever. In fact for a highly elevated Indian mind, this conceptual nexus is not far-fetched. The garden and the love of flowers strike a psychic chord at once beautiful and religiously mystical, as any reader of Wordsworth or other great poet in English or Sanskrit will agree. The point is that the multiform dispositions had been united by a spiritual thirst and if read in their integrality, could be designated religious-cum-charitable. In sum, the primary intendment was to dedicate as debutter and to direct fulfilment of uplifting religious and para-religious purposes, the focus being on worship of Sree Jagannathjee and the fall-out some subsidiary, yet significant, charitable items. The finer note struck b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... such an adjustment of human activities to the requirement of that power as may enable the individual believer to exist more happily is common to all 'religions'.". 19. In CIT v. Social Service Centre (2001) 250 ITR 39, 40, the Andhra Pradesh High Court opined, "We do not find that donation to a church or construction of a church is not a purpose which is not of general public utility. Therefore, the contention of the Department that the expenditure on religious activities could not be given exemption cannot be accepted particularly in the context of our polity. We are aware that most of the religious and charitable activities go together in this country." The assessee, which was a registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as a charitable trust was granted exemption /sections 11 and 12 of the Act. Charitable purpose includes benefit of a section of public 20. In CIT v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce (1965) 55 ITR 722, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the expression "object of general public utility" was not restricted to objects beneficial to the whole of mankind. An object beneficial to a section of public was an object of general public utility. To serve as a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... different view from that taken in earlier proceedings, the question of the exemption of the assessee appellant should not have been reopened. Strictly speaking, res judicata does not apply to income tax proceedings. Though, each assessment year being a unit, what was decided in one year might not apply in the following year; where a fundamental aspect permeating through the different assessment years has been found as a fact one way or the other and parties have allowed that position to be sustained by not challenging the order, it would not be at all appropriate to allow the position to be changed in a subsequent year. 24. In Director of Income Tax v. Lovely Bal Shiksha Parishad, (2004) 266 ITR 349, the Delhi High Court observed that in view of the fact that no change in the nature of activities had been pointed out and the assessee had been granted exemption under Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, not only in respect of the earlier years but subsequent years as well, the assessee was entitled to exemption in the assessment year 1991-92. 25. In CIT v. N.P. Mathew (2006) 280 ITR 44, the Kerala High Court observed that in Income Tax Proceedings difference should not be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... but by another registered charitable Society. The High Court had found that the conduct of the educational institution is drawing from the assessee - trust larger sums than what had been credited by the trust in its favour in 1969-70 showed that it was fully aware of its credit with the assessee- trust and the funds that had been made available to it by the trust. It was no part of the Revenue's case at any point of time that the credit entries made in the assessee's books of accounts were not genuine or the trust or that they were make-believe or bogus. The Income-tax Officer had not doubted the said entries and called upon the assessee to produce the accounts of the college. The High Court was right in holding that the assessee was entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961. 29. In CIT v. Indian National Theater Trust (2008) 305 ITR 149, the Delhi High Court held that as far as the third question is concerned, on examining the orders passed by the authorities, in which the objects of both the assessee Trust as well as the Shriram Central for Art and cultural have been discussed, we are of the considered view that the Tribunal was correct in its conclusion ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ation for renewal w.e.f. 1.4.2000 uninfluenced by the order rejecting the renewal for the previous period 1995-2000. This judgment is of no help to the learned counsel for the respondents. 32. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and given my thoughtful consideration to the facts of the present case and the case laws cited at the Bar. 33. This Court is of the considered opinion that mere one contribution by the charitable trust to another trust which carried out repair and renovation of Lord Vishnu's Temple does not disentitle the petitioner - Trust from renewal of its exemption certificate under Section 80G of the Act. The line of distinction between religious purposes and charitable purposes is very thin and no water tight compartment between the two activities can be very well established. Unless objective of the charitable trust in question itself is for spending its income for a particular religion and it is so found in the trust-deed, the Income Tax Department cannot reject the renewal of the Trust as Charitable Trust under Section 80G of the Act merely because one particular expenditure is for an activity which may be termed as spending for a pa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s been relied upon by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax also in the impugned order, it was held on the basis of one particular clause (2)(h) of the trust-deed which read "to establish, maintain and to grant and/or aid to public places of worship and prayer halls. The Hon'ble Supreme Court dealing with Explanation 4 of Section 80G (5) held as under (page 582): "To reiterate, Explanation 3 does not require the ascertainment of whether the whole or substantially the whole of the institution or fund's charitable purpose is of religious nature. If it did, it would read differently. It requires the ascertainment of whether there is one purpose within the institution or fund's overall charitable purpose which is wholly, or substantially wholly, of a religious nature. There is little doubt that clause 2(h) of the trust deed which permits the trustees to support prayer halls and places of worship sets out a purpose the whole or substantially the whole of which is of religious nature, and this has not been seriously disputed. Therefore, in our view, the trust and the donation by the assessee to it fall outside the scope of section 80G. 37. The aforesaid case is clearly distingui ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
