Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (3) TMI 332

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 7) and there after 'Telecommunication Service', having been provided by an entity not qualifying to be a Telegraph Authority, whether liable to service tax? 1.1 Since the Appellant would be entitled for Cenvat credit of alleged service tax liability and also refund of it, will the demand for extended period be sustainable and penalties imposable on the ground of revenue neutrality? Brief Facts: 2. The Appellant is a subsidiary of Qualcomm Inc. USA. The said Qualcomm Inc USA has entered into a Master Service Agreement with a group entity 'Verizon Inc' located outside India for providing telecom bandwidth and telephone related services for all its affiliated entities across the globe. The Appellant being one of the group entities of Qualc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... efore this Tribunal. Submissions 6. Learned Counsel inter alia urges that at the outset it is submitted that the SCN proposes to levy service tax under the category of 'Internet Communication Service'. The said services were brought into the service tax ambit only with effect from 16.05.2008. Therefore, the present demand to the extent it covers the period from 01.10.2006 till 15.05.2008, will not be liable to service tax. 7. Without prejudice to the above, under section 65(57a) of Finance Act, 1994, "Internet telecommunication service" includes, - (i) Internet backbone services, including carrier services of internet traffic by one Internet Service Provider to another Internet Service Provider,  (ii) Internet access services, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... provision of wired or wireless telecommunication link between specified points for the exclusive use of the client; data transmission services including provision of access to wired or wireless facilities and services specifically designed for efficient transmission of data; but does not include service provided inter alia by any person in relation to internet telecommunication service referred to in subclause (zzzu) of clause (105). 10. The term leased circuit under Section 65(60) of the Finance Act, 1994 on the other hand means a dedicated link provided between two fixed locations for exclusive use of the subscriber and includes a speech circuit, a data circuit or a telegraph circuit. 11. The services availed by the Appellant from Veri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Appellant being a 100% Export Oriented Software Technology Park Unit, it would be entitled for refund of any such unutilized service tax paid on its input services. Thus, there exists a direct case of revenue neutrality. In this situation, invocation of extended period and levy of penalties including mandatory penalty is not be justified. 14. The Appellant relies on the following judgements: (a) J.P.P. Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Salem, 2016 (46) S.T.R. 317 (Tri. - Chennai) (pg no. 23 of compilation) (b) Nirlon Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, 2015 (320) E.L.T. 22 (S.C.) (pg no. 26 of compilation) (c) Asmitha Microfin Ltd. vs Commr. of Cus., C. Ex. & S.T., Hyderabad-III, 2020 (33) G.S.T.L. 250 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Circuit"/"Telecommunication service" received from M/s Verizon Communications Singapore Pte Ltd. This Tribunal held that service tax liability does not arise under Section 66A of the Finance Act, if service is not specified under Section 65(105) of the Finance Act. The Tribunal relied on the ruling of Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in Karvy Consultants Ltd. 2006 (1) S.T.R. 7(A.P.), wherein the question involved was levy on service of banking & financial transaction under taken by Karvy Consultants Ltd, which was registered as NBFC, but their principal business was not of receiving deposit/lending. The High Court has held that the service provider should be both a company and with principle business of receiving deposit/lending. Mere reg .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates