2016 (7) TMI 1673

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... For the Appellants : Shri P K Sahu, Advocate. For the Respondent : Shri Sanjay Jain, AR. Per Archana Wadhwa For the Bench : The Misc application is for early hearing of the appeal. 2. After hearing both sides, we find that the dispute in the present appeal relates to the availment of abatement of 67% in terms of notification No. 1/2006, which stand denied on the ground that the appellant hav .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 5. In view of the foregoing, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the original adjudicating authority for fresh decision. Needless to say that the appellant should be given an opportunity to put forth their case before the adjudicating authority and they are at liberty to refer and rely on any other decision which they may choose to. It is also clarified that we have not gon .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X