TMI Blog2008 (12) TMI 142X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the extent of the demand of differential Service tax and not the refund of Service tax already paid - No any justification for staying the impugned orders of the Commissioner (A) - However, considering the high revenue implication, we order early hearing of the cases - ST/200-201/2008 - 1215-1216/2008 - Dated:- 17-12-2008 - S/Shri T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) and M.V. Ravindran, Member (J) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itled for availament of the benefit of the said Notifications. Consequently, the adjudication orders were passed demanding the differential duty to the extent of 75%. The respondents approached the Commissioner (A) for relief. After going through the legal provisions, the Commissioner (A) set aside the Orders-in Original granting consequential relief to the respondents. The learned advocate invite ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... orders of the Commissioner (A). However, considering the high revenue implication and also the contentious points urged by both the sides, we order early hearing of the cases on 25th February 2009. In the mean time, the learned advocate Shri K.S. Ravi Shankar stated that the respondent would not press for the refund of the taxes already paid till the appeals are disposed of. The stay applications ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
