TMI Blog2023 (9) TMI 491X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... anan For the Petitioner : Mr.P.J.Rishikesh For the R1 to R4 : Dr.B.Ramaswamy Senior Standing Counsel For the R5 : Mr.J.C.Durairaj Additional Government Pleader ORDER Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the first to fourth respondents and Mr.J.C.Durairaj, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the fifth respondent. 2. The petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ide order dated 27.11.2006. 6. A further appeal of the petitioner before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in I.T.(SS)A.No.17/Mds/07 for the block assessment period 1988-1989 to 1998-1999 was allowed on the ground that there was violation principles of natural justice by the ITAT Bench, Chennai on 30.03.2007. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remitted the case back to the Assessing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has no vigour. 10. It is therefore submitted that despite the same, the order of attachment is reflected in the registers maintained in respect of the property before the Registration Department. It is therefore submitted that the order is liable to be quashed and the petition be allowed. 11. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Senior S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion/reply dated 16.05.2023 and 29.05.2023 and dispose the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The de novo proceeding which ordered by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is also directed to completed. 15. The present Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, conne ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|