9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (9) TMI 1276X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Shri D. Bhattacharya, G.A. and K. De, Addl. G.A., for the Respondent. JUDGMENT Heard Ms. Nitu Hawelia and Ms. Medha Lila Gope, Learned Counsel assisted by Ms. Simita Chakraborty Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Learned G.A. appearing for the respondents. 2. All these writ petitions being W.P. (C) No. 155 of 2022 [KSS Petron Private Limited v. St ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er ONGC for the period 2010 to 2016. In respect of the said works contract the ONGC made payment to the petitioner by deducting Tax at source under the said works and deposited the same to the Government Treasury. However, while deducting Tax at source to ONGC deducted tax at full rate on works contract value without deducting labour component, declared goods, goods under inter-State sale etc. as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ders etc. for the Assessment years of 2010-11 to 2015-16. However, the Respondent Authorities rejected the application of the petitioner vide order dated 31-8-2021. The Respondents have filed an affidavit stating that the refund under Section 43 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 have been rejected in view of non-passing of the order of assessment orders for the assessment years 2010-11 to 2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004 after giving the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The entire exercise is to be completed within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of this order. It is further provided that in case the petitioner is still aggrieved by the order thereafter passed by the Respondent No. 3, the petitioner is given a liberty to file petition again ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
