Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2023 (10) TMI 715

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng powers under Section 83 of the Central Goods And Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) ordering provisional attachment of the Petitioner's Bank Account No. 50200033711279 held by the Petitioner in the HDFC Bank, Anjur Road, Mankoli, Bhiwandi Branch. There is also a provisional attachment order passed under Section 83 dated 6th April 2023 by which the immovable property, being Flat No. C-103, 1st Floor, Durga Residency, Kharbav Village, Taluka Bhiwandi, Thane, Maharashtra-401 302 has been provisionally attached by such order as communicated to the Joint Sub-Registrar, Bhiwandi Taluka-I at Bhiwandi. 2. The Petitioner is before this Court assailing both such orders passed under Section 83 of the CGST Act. The primary contention as urged on beha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner but also the immovable property. We also note that the impugned order/s are passed invoking the provisions of Section 83 of the CGST Act in Form GST/DRC-22. 4. On perusal of Rule 159, in our opinion, sub-rule (5) would be relevant in the context of the contentions as raised by the Petitioner, which is to the effect that such rule provides for an opportunity to the Petitioner to file an objection to the attachment in question and on which the Commissioner would hear the Petitioner. It would be appropriate to extract sub-rule (5) of Rule 159 of the CGST Rules, which reads thus:- "Rule 159. Provisional attachment of property.- (1)....... (2) ..... (3) .... (4) ..... (5) Any person whose property is attached may file an ob .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Petitioner would be to invoke sub-rule (5) by raising an objection to the orders of attachment in question as the rule itself would permit. Thus, considering such stage of the proceedings, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to exercise our discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to interfere in the impugned attachment orders. 7. We accordingly do not entertain the present petition. It is rejected, however, keeping open the remedy of the Petitioner to invoke sub-rule (5) of Rule 159 of the CGST Rules. All contentions in that regard are expressly kept open. 8. As the Petitioner was bonafide pursuing the present petition, we permit the Petitioner to raise an objection by invokin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates