9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (1) TMI 561X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... SRI NARASIMHA And HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR For the Petitioner : M/S. Manoj Swarup And Co., AOR Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Swarup, Adv. Mr. Chetan Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. N Venkatraman, A.S.G. Mr. Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR Mr. V Chandrashekhara Bharathi, Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. ORDER Leave Granted. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... passed an order on 31.01.2012, directing the Appellant to file the paper books within a period of 15 days, failing which the appeal was to be dismissed without reference to the Court. As the paper books were not filed within the prescribed time, the Registrar vide his order dated 30.04.2012 proceeded to record that the appeals stood dismissed as per order dated 31.01.2012. The application for res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for AY 2001-2002 which was already pending. By a subsequent order dated 09.04.2012, the High Court directed preparation and filing of the paper books within a period of 10 weeks from the date of order. The necessary was done by the Appellant and the appeal was to be heard. In the meanwhile, as the connected Appeal No. 817 of 2008 was taken up individually and came to be dismissed by the Registrar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... missed. We are of the opinion that the High Court would have condoned the delay in filing the paper books in Appeal No. 817 of 2008 had the matter been taken up along with Appeal No. 816 of 2008. As Appeal No. 817 of 2008 stood dismissed for noncompliance, the High Court was of the opinion that inconsistent orders cannot be passed and proceeded to dismiss even Appeal No. 816 of 2008 without exami ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
