9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (11) TMI 1813X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ord, apart from the pleadings of the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, the list dated 01.11.2017 published by the Registrar of Companies, Tamil Nadu, Chennai uploaded in the website of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, New Delhi disqualifying the Petitioner to hold the Office of the Directorship of a Company under Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act 2013, which came into effect from 01.04.2014, is challenged with the consequential direction to the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to get re-appointed or appointed as Directors in any other Company without any hindrance. 3. The lists dated 08.09.2017 and 01.11.2017 published by the Registrar of Companies, Tamil Nadu, Chennai were the subject matter of challenge before this Court i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i.e., 30.9.2017, additionally in the light of Section 164(2)(a) referring to "annual return" and "financial statement", the time limit to file annual return under Section 92(4) of 2013 Act is sixty days from Annual General Meeting or the last date on which Annual General Meeting ought to have been held, hence, the time limit to file balance sheet under Section 137(1) of the 2013 Act is again thirty days from Annual General Meering. Therefore, in view of these legal position, the disqualification could get triggered off only on or after 30.10.2017 only, if any company fails to file annual forms for three financial years. Importantly, it is to be borne in mind that even beyond that time limit, additional time limit of 270 days was available ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... her, under Section 441(4), the default in filing returns or accounts compoundable by Tribunal or Regional Director or by any officer authorized by the Central Government. (f) In view of the above legal position, when the default in filing the accounts or returns are made as compoundable offence, Section 164(2)(a) providing the disqualification of director of private company not only in the defaulting company, but also from other company in which the petitioner is a director, diligently and meticulously following every provision of law, is certainly disproportionate to the lapse, as it is only regulatory in nature, because, notice to be sent under Section 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 by the Registrar of Companies for striking off the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rn for any continuous period of three financial years as per Section 164(2)(a). 30. For all the aforementioned reasons, the impugned orders are set aside and the writ petitions shall stand allowed. Consequently, all the connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.'' 4. As the Petitioner in this case is similarly placed to the Petitioners in the aforesaid batch of cases relating to the same impugned lists published in the website by the Respondents, he is entitled to identical relief that has been granted to them. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands allowed and the impugned order is set aside on the aforesaid terms. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
