TMI Blog2024 (2) TMI 300X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to be relied upon - HELD THAT:- The Counsel for the respective parties do not dispute that in context of the impugned order under challenge in this petition i.e. dated 4-9-2020, this Court in case of a co-noticee by an order in GYSCOAL ALLOYS LTD. ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ANR. [ 2023 (2) TMI 777 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] has quashed and set aside the order and issued directions holding that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 3. The Counsel for the respective parties do not dispute that in context of the impugned order under challenge in this petition i.e. dated 4-9-2020, this Court in case of a co-noticee by an order dated 15-2-2023 [2023 (384) E.L.T. 265 (Guj.) = (2023) 4 Centax 2 (Guj.)] has quashed and set aside the order and issued direction ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... thin two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order through e-mail to respective advocates as also through R.P.A.D. 10.2 Once this opportunity of personal hearing is granted, without seeking any further adjournment, is the petitioner/s shall cooperate. 10.3 Let the adjudicating authority decide the issue of the cross-examination of the witnesses in two weeks thereafter. 10.4 The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
