9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (2) TMI 857X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration dated November 15, 2022 and the order dated December 30, 2023 passed in appeal under Section 107 of the Uttar Pradesh Good ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sion Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.172 of 2023 titled as Surendra Bahadur Singh v. State of U.P. and others decided on August 23, 2023, wherein the Division Bench has held as follows: "6. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that although no fault can be found with the appellate order dismissing the appeal as Appellate Authority does not have the power to condone the delay in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nd as the same is devoid of any reasons, the same can be challenged before this Court as decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks, Mumbai and Ors. - (1998) 8 SCC 1. 7. He further places reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Om Prakash Mishra v. State of U.P. & Ors.; Writ Tax No.100 of 2022 decided on 06.09.2022 where ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... missioner, Gonda shall proceed to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and after considering whatever defence he may take." 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relies upon a coordinate Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.1476 of 2022 titled as M/s Namo Narayan Singh v. State of U.P. and others decided on October 10, 2023 to emphasis the point ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
