Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - onus to prove - The Pr. CIT found the assessment order...

Revision u/s 263 - unexplained cash deposits - onus to prove - The Pr. CIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue's interests due to inadequate verification. - The Tribunal upheld the Ld. Principal Commissioner's decision, stating that the AO had not adequately examined the sources of cash deposits nor obtained relevant details or evidence before accepting explanations. The appellant failed to provide documentary evidence supporting claims, and the AO's assessment lacked thorough inquiry. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X