9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (5) TMI 118X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Respondent : C.S.C. ORDER HON'BLE VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioners challenge the order in original for cancellation of registration dated 06.04.2023 and the order dated 07.02.2023 passed in appeal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... no reply was submitted. He relies upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.172 of 2023 titled as Surendra Bahadur Singh v. State of U.P. and others decided on August 23, 2023, wherein the Division Bench has held as follows: "6. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that although no fault can be found with the appellate order dismissing the appeal as Appellate Authority doe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted 07.01.2023 which affects the petitioner and as the same is devoid of any reasons, the same can be challenged before this Court as decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks, Mumbai and Ors. - (1998) 8 SCC 1. 7. He further places reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of Om Prakash Mishra v. State of U.P. & Ors.; Writ T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... The Adjudicating Authority i.e. Assistant Commissioner, Gonda shall proceed to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and after considering whatever defence he may take." 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relies upon a coordinate Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.1476 of 2022 titled as M/s Namo Narayan Singh v. State of U.P. and others deci ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
