9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (3) TMI 2061X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... half of the Revenue. ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :- This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 14, Kolkata, (hereinafter the 'Ld. CIT(A)'), dt. 31/05/2017, passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the 'Act'), relating to Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The assessee is an individual. He filed his return ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppeal the ld. CIT(A) upheld the order of the Assessing Officer. He held that the assessee has not provided any evidence in support of his claim that the commission estimated at 2% of the deposits made is excessive. At the last para of page 3 of his order, he held as follows:- "During appeal, the appellant has once again not been able to produce any supporting material in support of his ground of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... essment Year 2010-11; Jaswant Singh vs. ITO; order dt. 14/09/2018, for the proposition that in such cases commission at 0.1% needs to be computed as income of the assessee. 4.1. The ld. D/R, opposed these contentions but was not in a position to place on record any case law or precedent to controvert the case law cited by the assessee. 5. We have heard rival contentions. On careful consideration ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
