9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (2) TMI 1465X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dent: C.S.C. ORDER Heard Sri Rishi Tandon, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration dated June 10, 2022 and the order dated July 27, 2023 passed in appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ts the above statement saying that no reply was filed by the petitioner. He relies upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.172 of 2023 titled as Surendra Bahadur Singh v. State of U.P. and others decided on August 23, 2023, wherein the Division Bench has held as follows:" 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that although no fault can be found with the appellate order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l have no application and it is only the order dated 07.01.2023 which affects the petitioner and as the same is devoid of any reasons, the same can be challenged before this Court as decided by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Whirlpool Corporation v. Registrar of Trademarks, Mumbai and Ors. - (1998) 8 SCC 1. 7. He further places reliance on the judgment of this Court in the case of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e notice within a period of three weeks from today. The Adjudicating Authority i.e. Assistant Commissioner, Gonda shall proceed to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and after considering whatever defence he may take." 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further relies upon a coordinate Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.1476 of 2022 titled as M/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
