9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (1) TMI 740X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Appellant : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Arup Banerjee, AOR Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Adv. Mr. Mayank Kshirsagar, AOR Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Mehta, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR M/S. Law Associates, AOR Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv. M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, AOR Mrs. V. D. Khanna, AOR Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. Jogy Scaria, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Soumya Dutta, AOR Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Sr. Adv. M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, AOR Mr. Soayib Qureshi, AOR Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff, AOR Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. M/S. Karanjawala & Co. AOR Mr. Arvind Datar, Adv. Mr. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ging the impugned judgment dated 17.02.2020 passed by the NCLAT in the said Company Appeal(AT)(Insolvency)No.957/2019, approving the Resolution Plan submitted by the successful Resolution Applicant JSW Steel Ltd. with modification/clarification as mentioned therein. 2. These Civil Appeals were tagged along with the Civil Appeal No.1808/2020 filed by Kalyani Transco against Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. and Others along with the other Civil Appeals. 3. The issue involved in the instant Appeals pertained to the jurisdiction of the E.D. to attach the properties of the Corporate Debtor, which was undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, particularly in the light of Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). 4. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 8(8) of the PMLA read with Rule 3A of the said Rules. 5. The learned senior counsel Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi appearing for the CoC and learned senior advocate Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul appearing for the successful Resolution Applicant have also stated that they have no objection if these Appeals are disposed of as prayed for in the light of the said Affidavit filed on behalf of the E.D. 6. In view of the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the E.D. and the learned counsel for the CoC and for the successful Resolution Applicant JSW, following order is passed without expressing any opinion on the merits of the Appeals and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respective parties in the connected Appeals and othe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
