TMI Blog2023 (3) TMI 1558X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... NMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA Petitioners: Mr. Shadman Ahmed Siddiqui, Advocate Respondents: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocate ORDER 1. These petitions have been filed stating that the Respondent herein has not complied with the directions issued by a Division Bench of this Court vide common order dated 22.11.2022, passed in separate writ petitions filed by the Petitioners herein. 2. The Petitioner sta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espondents are also in correspondence DGGI (Hq.) who has searched the office of the Petitioners on 17.09.2019, however, replies are awaited. 3.1. He states that it is in these aforesaid circumstances that the Respondent has been unable to return the documents seized vide the said panchnama and there is no wilful disobedience. 3.2. He states that therefore, the present petition be disposed of tak ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arches dated 17.09.2020 and 24.11.2020 have been completed and handed over to the Petitioner(s) herein. 7. The Respondent has placed on record its stand with respect to the circumstances in which it has been unable to furnish the documents seized vide panchnama dated 17.09.2019. The Respondent has stated that the said file is untraceable and the Respondent has initiated steps for tracing the said ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|