9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (4) TMI 734X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hil Gaba, Mr. Kapil Sharma & Ms. Srishti Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Advocate. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 21051/2025 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 4551/2025 3. The present petition reveals the harrowing experience that a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... de a refund application bearing reference number ARN No,: AA071021U32694M. The said application was rejected by the Respondent-GST Department vide order dated 10th January, 2022. 5. The said order was challenged by the Petitioner through a writ petition, being W.P.(C) 5551/2024, in which the Court passed the following orders. Order dated 23rd April, 2024 "1. Learned counsel for petitioner subm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the respondent under instructions submits that the respondent shall recredit the amount of Rs.10,45,793/- into the Electronic Cash Ledger of the petitioner within two weeks. 2. The statement is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of directing the Proper Officer to recredit the amount of Rs.10,45,793/- into the electronic cash ledger of the petitioner within t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r personal hearing the refund has been rejected. 8. The present writ petition marks the second instance wherein the Petitioner has approached this Court seeking refund. It is a matter of concern that almost a year ago, the same Petitioner had appeared before a Coordinate Bench of this Court, which, after considering the matter, directed that the refund amount be re-credited within a period of two ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
