Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (5) TMI 390

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for granting approval u/s 10(23C)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. 2. That the rejection of application u/s 10(23C)(iii) is against the facts and circumstances of the case. 3. That the replies as filed during the course of proceedings before the CIT(Exemptions) have not been considered properly. 4. That the appellant craves leave to add or amend the grounds of appeal before the appeal is finally heard or deposed off." 3. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the Indian Institute of Management Sirmaur is a Centrally Funded Institution of National Importance set up by the Government of India in 2015. IIM Sirmaur is one of the newer institutions of the IIM family in the country. As a premier institution, under aegis of Ministry of Educatio .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ome Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh for final registration under clause (iii) of first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10 of the Act in Form 10AB dated 17.04.2024. 8. The CIT (Exemptions) called for detailed information, which was complied and no objection was raised to the activities carried out by the Trust. The CIT (Exemptions) refused to grant the registration, since it was noticed that the provisional approval could not have been granted to the assessee as the appellant has already commenced its activities in 2015 and, thus, it was stated by the CIT (Exemptions) that provisional approval being bad in law and, thus, rejected the application of the assessee. 9. It was argued by the Ld. Counsel that the assessee is engaged in providing .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mistake by the assessee for claiming the legitimate exemption/deduction, the Income Tax Authority is duty bound to consider such legitimate claim and give it under the proper and legitimate section to the assessee, even if it is claimed under wrong section. The Counsel also relied upon the following judgments: - a. The Habrol Cooperative Agricultural Service Society Limited vs. The ITO in ITA No. 158/Chd/2024 dated 26.09.2024 ITAT Chd. b. Punjab Agriculture University vs. The DCIT(Exemption), Chandigarh in ITA No. 661/Chd/2024 and 492/Chd/2024 dated 18.12.2024 ITAT Chd c. CIT vs Heidrick and Struggles Inc. reported in 461 ITR 33 (Delhi High Court) dated 25.07.2023 12. The assessee further, relied upon the judgment of Chandigarh Benc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... section 10 is rejected. The appellant Institute is existing since 2015 and, as such, the approval was refused only on account of technical mistake on the part of the counsel of the assessee, who inadvertently had choosen wrong subsection while moving the application for approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to clause (23C) of section 10. 15. The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT in similar facts and circumstances, in the case of The Harbrol Cooperative Agricultural Service Society Ltd. in ITA No. 158/Chd/2024, where a similar issue was there has taken a view that if there is mistake by the assessee for claiming legitimate deduction, the AO is duty bound to consider such legitimate deduction to the assessee even if, it was not claimed or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re of the considered opinion that Assessee's appeal on grounds in both the assessment years i.e., 2018-19 and 2019-20 should be allowed. 24. In the result, Assessee's appeal for A.Y. 2018-19 and 2019-20 are allowed." 17. We have also gone through the judgment of Delhi High Court in the case of Heidrick and Struggles Inc., reported in 461 ITR 33 and, wherein, the following finding has been given:- "15. Having regard to the aforesaid, we are of the view that the Tribunal has taken a just view in consonance with the provisions of the Act and the aforementioned circular issued by the CBDT. Undoubtedly, the appellant/revenue can seek to levy tax only on income which falls within the ambit of the Act. Merely because the respondent/as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates